These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25539733)
41. Validation of Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitors in Older Adults With Varied Ambulatory Abilities. Floegel TA; Florez-Pregonero A; Hekler EB; Buman MP J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 72(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 27257217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings. Lee JA; Williams SM; Brown DD; Laurson KR J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 25517396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Validity of the Fitbit Ace and Moki Devices for Assessing Steps During Different Walking Conditions in Young Adolescents. Sun X; Adams SA; Li C; Booth JN; Robertson J; Fawkner S Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2022 Feb; 34(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 34784580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site. Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort. Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of GT3X accelerometer and YAMAX pedometer steps/day in a free-living sample of overweight and obese adults. Barriera TV; Tudor-Locke C; Champagne CM; Broyles ST; Johnson WD; Katzmarzyk PT J Phys Act Health; 2013 Feb; 10(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 22821951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running. Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments. Nakagata T; Murakami H; Kawakami R; Tripette J; Nakae S; Yamada Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S; Miyachi M Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():24-33. PubMed ID: 36030707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults. Magistro D; Brustio PR; Ivaldi M; Esliger DW; Zecca M; Rainoldi A; Boccia G PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190753. PubMed ID: 29425196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions. Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them? Wendel N; Macpherson CE; Webber K; Hendron K; DeAngelis T; Colon-Semenza C; Ellis T Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 98(8):705-714. PubMed ID: 29718452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Modeling Clinically Validated Physical Activity Assessments Using Commodity Hardware. Winfree KN; Dominick G IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 Mar; 22(2):335-345. PubMed ID: 29505401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Step count accuracy of StepWatch and FitBit One™ among individuals with a unilateral transtibial amputation. Arch ES; Sions JM; Horne J; Bodt BA Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):518-526. PubMed ID: 29623810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE FITBIT FLEX™ AND ACTIGRAPH GT3X+ AT JOGGING AND RUNNING SPEEDS. Jones D; Crossley K; Dascombe B; Hart HF; Kemp J Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 13(5):860-870. PubMed ID: 30276018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls. Blondeel A; Demeyer H; Janssens W; Troosters T PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236676. PubMed ID: 32750073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of the Fitbit Zip for Measuring Steps for Adolescents With Visual Impairments. Haegele JA; Brian AS; Wolf D Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2017 Apr; 34(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 28556761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Fulk GD; Combs SA; Danks KA; Nirider CD; Raja B; Reisman DS Phys Ther; 2014 Feb; 94(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 24052577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Accuracy of Smart Devices for Measuring Physical Activity in Daily Life: Validation Study. Degroote L; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Verloigne M; Poppe L; Crombez G JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Dec; 6(12):e10972. PubMed ID: 30545810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions. Vanhelst J; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuan G; Dieu O; Blondeau T; Fardy P; Béghin L BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr; 5():187. PubMed ID: 22534207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Opal Actigraphy (Activity and Sleep) Measures Compared to ActiGraph: A Validation Study. Shah VV; Brumbach BH; Pearson S; Vasilyev P; King E; Carlson-Kuhta P; Mancini M; Horak FB; Sowalsky K; McNames J; El-Gohary M Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]