These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25540126)

  • 1. A comparison of scanpath comparison methods.
    Anderson NC; Anderson F; Kingstone A; Bischof WF
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1377-1392. PubMed ID: 25540126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image-type dependent eigen-regions-of-interest define conspicuity operators for predicting human scanpath fixation.
    Fujita T; Privitera CM; Stark LW
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jul; 37(7):965-74. PubMed ID: 16919257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Novel Eye Movement Data Transformation Technique that Preserves Temporal Information: A Demonstration in a Face Processing Task.
    Król M; Król ME
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 31126117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task.
    Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory.
    Foulsham T; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 22506754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It depends on how you look at it: scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach.
    Dewhurst R; Nyström M; Jarodzka H; Foulsham T; Johansson R; Holmqvist K
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1079-100. PubMed ID: 22648695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):6.1-17. PubMed ID: 18318632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On metrics for measuring scanpath similarity.
    Fahimi R; Bruce NDB
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):609-628. PubMed ID: 32779104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of Scanpath Regularity in Reading.
    von der Malsburg T; Kliegl R; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Sep; 39(7):1675-703. PubMed ID: 25530253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Humans have idiosyncratic and task-specific scanpaths for judging faces.
    Kanan C; Bseiso DN; Ray NA; Hsiao JH; Cottrell GW
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():67-76. PubMed ID: 25641371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes.
    Dorr M; Martinetz T; Gegenfurtner KR; Barth E
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):28. PubMed ID: 20884493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recurrence quantification analysis of radiologists' scanpaths when interpreting mammograms.
    Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3052-3062. PubMed ID: 29694675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scanpath similarity measure reveals not only a decreased social preference, but also an increased nonsocial preference in individuals with autism.
    Król ME; Król M
    Autism; 2020 Feb; 24(2):374-386. PubMed ID: 31353926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SubsMatch 2.0: Scanpath comparison and classification based on subsequence frequencies.
    Kübler TC; Rothe C; Schiefer U; Rosenstiel W; Kasneci E
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1048-1064. PubMed ID: 27443354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atypical scanpaths in schizophrenia: evidence of a trait- or state-dependent phenomenon?
    Beedie SA; Benson PJ; St Clair DM
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2011 May; 36(3):150-64. PubMed ID: 21223647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ongoing eye movements constrain visual perception.
    Hafed ZM; Krauzlis RJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 9(11):1449-57. PubMed ID: 17028586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.
    Ma X; Liu Y; Clariana R; Gu C; Li P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):730-750. PubMed ID: 35445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel method for analyzing sequential eye movements reveals strategic influence on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.
    Hayes TR; Petrov AA; Sederberg PB
    J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):10. PubMed ID: 21926182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SoftMatch: Comparing Scanpaths Using Combinatorial Spatio-Temporal Sequences with Fractal Curves.
    Newport RA; Russo C; Liu S; Suman AA; Di Ieva A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning to conclusions? Visual attention to neutral faces under stress in individuals with and without subclinical paranoia.
    Hillmann TE; Ascone L; Kempkensteffen J; Lincoln TM
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():137-143. PubMed ID: 27597173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.