121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25540837)
1. Effects of ionic strength and ion pairing on (plant-wide) modelling of anaerobic digestion.
Solon K; Flores-Alsina X; Mbamba CK; Volcke EI; Tait S; Batstone D; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25540837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A plant-wide aqueous phase chemistry module describing pH variations and ion speciation/pairing in wastewater treatment process models.
Flores-Alsina X; Kazadi Mbamba C; Solon K; Vrecko D; Tait S; Batstone DJ; Jeppsson U; Gernaey KV
Water Res; 2015 Nov; 85():255-65. PubMed ID: 26342179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of the anaerobic digestion model (ADM1) in the PHREEQC chemistry engine.
Huber P; Neyret C; Fourest E
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 76(5-6):1090-1103. PubMed ID: 28876250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions for dynamic simulations of anaerobic digestion processes.
Flores-Alsina X; Solon K; Kazadi Mbamba C; Tait S; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U; Batstone DJ
Water Res; 2016 May; 95():370-82. PubMed ID: 27107338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling of the mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater with olive mill solid waste using anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1).
Boubaker F; Ridha BC
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Sep; 99(14):6565-77. PubMed ID: 18187320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic modelling the effects of ionic strength and ion complexation on trace metal speciation during anaerobic digestion.
George S; Mattei MR; Frunzo L; Esposito G; van Hullebusch ED; Fermoso FG
J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 343():118144. PubMed ID: 37285696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling anaerobic co-digestion in Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2: Parameter estimation, substrate characterisation and plant-wide integration.
Arnell M; Astals S; Åmand L; Batstone DJ; Jensen PD; Jeppsson U
Water Res; 2016 Jul; 98():138-46. PubMed ID: 27088248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the IWA anaerobic digestion model (ADM1) for simulating full-scale anaerobic sewage sludge digestion.
Shang Y; Johnson BR; Sieger R
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):487-92. PubMed ID: 16180468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
Ekama GA
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a plant-wide phosphorus modelling approach with minerals precipitation in a full-scale WWTP.
Kazadi Mbamba C; Flores-Alsina X; John Batstone D; Tait S
Water Res; 2016 Sep; 100():169-183. PubMed ID: 27187049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs.
Flores-Alsina X; Arnell M; Amerlinck Y; Corominas L; Gernaey KV; Guo L; Lindblom E; Nopens I; Porro J; Shaw A; Snip L; Vanrolleghem PA; Jeppsson U
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():616-24. PubMed ID: 23959217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interaction between control and design of a SHARON reactor: economic considerations in a plant-wide (BSM2) context.
Volcke EI; van Loosdrecht MC; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):117-25. PubMed ID: 18025739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaerobic digestion: a new model for plant-wide wastewater treatment process modelling.
Copp JB; Belia E; Snowling S; Schraa O
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):1-11. PubMed ID: 16459771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An ASM/ADM model interface for dynamic plant-wide simulation.
Nopens I; Batstone DJ; Copp JB; Jeppsson U; Volcke E; Alex J; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):1913-23. PubMed ID: 19232670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the anaerobic digestion of cane-molasses vinasse: extension of the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) with sulfate reduction for a very high strength and sulfate rich wastewater.
Barrera EL; Spanjers H; Solon K; Amerlinck Y; Nopens I; Dewulf J
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():42-54. PubMed ID: 25589435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for simulating anaerobic mesophilic sludge digestion.
Mendes C; Esquerre K; Matos Queiroz L
Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():89-95. PubMed ID: 25458762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for its application to an industrial wastewater treatment plant treating winery effluent wastewater.
García-Diéguez C; Bernard O; Roca E
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Mar; 132():244-53. PubMed ID: 23411455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Algebraic solution of the mass balanced ADM1 to predict the steady state and to optimise the design of the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge.
de Gracia M; Huete E; García-Heras JL; Ayesa E
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):127-36. PubMed ID: 18025740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
