These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25541513)

  • 21. Give it a second try? The influence of feedback and performance in the decision of reattempting.
    Chung WY; Darriba Á; Yeung N; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105803. PubMed ID: 38703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How an uncertain cue modulates subsequent monetary outcome evaluation: an ERP study.
    Xu Q; Shen Q; Chen P; Ma Q; Sun D; Pan Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Nov; 505(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 22027182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task.
    Becker MP; Nitsch AM; Miltner WH; Straube T
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(8):3005-12. PubMed ID: 24553940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.
    Li P; Jia S; Feng T; Liu Q; Suo T; Li H
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1727-33. PubMed ID: 20452440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1295-309. PubMed ID: 25453608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.
    Donkers FC; Nieuwenhuis S; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):777-87. PubMed ID: 16249075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.
    Mushtaq F; Wilkie RM; Mon-Williams MA; Schaefer A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():868-879. PubMed ID: 26497268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brain correlates of risky decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Sartori G; Rumiati R; Vidotto G; Daum I
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1886-94. PubMed ID: 19761850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
    Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Goal relevance influences performance monitoring at the level of the FRN and P3 components.
    Walentowska W; Moors A; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1020-33. PubMed ID: 27091565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization.
    Hauser TU; Iannaccone R; Stämpfli P; Drechsler R; Brandeis D; Walitza S; Brem S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():159-68. PubMed ID: 23973408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aberrant reward prediction errors in young adult at-risk alcohol users.
    Cao Z; Bennett M; O'Halloran L; Pragulbickaite G; Flanagan L; McHugh L; Whelan R
    Addict Biol; 2021 Jan; 26(1):e12873. PubMed ID: 31975507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of context condition on outcome evaluation in experimental conditions: Even vs. neutral.
    Zhu S; Wang Y; Gao S; Jia S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():28-36. PubMed ID: 31071359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Loss feedback negativity elicited by single- versus conjoined-feature stimuli.
    Liu Y; Gehring WJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Apr; 20(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 19293730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrocortical components of anticipation and consumption in a monetary incentive delay task.
    Angus DJ; Latham AJ; Harmon-Jones E; Deliano M; Balleine B; Braddon-Mitchell D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Nov; 54(11):1686-1705. PubMed ID: 28675491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What is and what could have been: an ERP study on counterfactual comparisons.
    Osinsky R; Walter H; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 24749988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 23792216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Holroyd CB; Simons RF
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 16005561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss.
    Dunning JP; Hajcak G
    Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1875-8. PubMed ID: 18090330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.