BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25541977)

  • 1. Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.
    Dendumrongsup T; Plumb AA; Halligan S; Fanshawe TR; Altman DG; Mallett S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116018. PubMed ID: 25541977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonography.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Collins GS; Altman DG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e107633. PubMed ID: 25353643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    HÃ¥konsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalized linear mixed models for multi-reader multi-case studies of diagnostic tests.
    Liu W; Pantoja-Galicia N; Zhang B; Kotz RM; Pennello G; Zhang H; Jacob J; Zhang Z
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1373-1388. PubMed ID: 25847911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
    Gallas BD; Brown DG
    Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The average receiver operating characteristic curve in multireader multicase imaging studies.
    Chen W; Samuelson FW
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 87(1040):20140016. PubMed ID: 24884728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
    Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.
    Abbey CK; Gallas BD; Boone JM; Niklason LT; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Samuelson FW
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 24594418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new concordant partial AUC and partial c statistic for imbalanced data in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
    Carrington AM; Fieguth PW; Qazi H; Holzinger A; Chen HH; Mayr F; Manuel DG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31906931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the area under an ROC curve a valid measure of the performance of a screening or diagnostic test?
    Wald NJ; Bestwick JP
    J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24407586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
    Hwang YT; Wang CC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves: Additional flexibility by using semiparametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):528-538. PubMed ID: 31231986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
    Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 Apr; 48(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21532099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.