147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542092)
1. Evaluation of aromatic amines with different purities and different solvent vehicles in the Ames test.
Harding AP; Popelier PL; Harvey J; Giddings A; Foster G; Kranz M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 25542092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A knowledge-based expert rule system for predicting mutagenicity (Ames test) of aromatic amines and azo compounds.
Gadaleta D; Manganelli S; Manganaro A; Porta N; Benfenati E
Toxicology; 2016 Aug; 370():20-30. PubMed ID: 27644887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resolution of contradiction between in silico predictions and Ames test results for four pharmaceutically relevant impurities.
Gunther WC; Kenyon MO; Cheung JR; Dugger RW; Dobo KL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91():68-76. PubMed ID: 29061373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: A case study using aromatic amine mutagenicity.
Ahlberg E; Amberg A; Beilke LD; Bower D; Cross KP; Custer L; Ford KA; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Honma M; Jolly R; Joossens E; Kemper RA; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Kuhnke L; Leavitt P; Naven R; Neilan C; Quigley DP; Shuey D; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; White A; Wichard J; Zwickl C; Myatt GJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():1-12. PubMed ID: 26879463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mutagenicity assessment strategy for pharmaceutical intermediates to aid limit setting for occupational exposure.
Araya S; Lovsin-Barle E; Glowienke S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 73(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 26454093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mutagenicity in V79 cells does not correlate with carcinogenity in small rodents for 12 aromatic amines.
Fassina G; Abbondandolo A; Mariani L; Taningher M; Parodi S
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1990; 29(1):109-30. PubMed ID: 2299684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
Amberg A; Beilke L; Bercu J; Bower D; Brigo A; Cross KP; Custer L; Dobo K; Dowdy E; Ford KA; Glowienke S; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Hasselgren C; Honma M; Jolly R; Kemper R; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Leavitt P; Miller S; Muster W; Nicolette J; Plaper A; Powley M; Quigley DP; Reddy MV; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; Weiner S; Welch DS; White A; Wichard J; Myatt GJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():13-24. PubMed ID: 26877192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of genotoxic potential of cosmetic ingredients by an in silico battery system consisting of a combination of an expert rule-based system and a statistics-based system.
Aiba née Kaneko M; Hirota M; Kouzuki H; Mori M
J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 40(1):77-98. PubMed ID: 25743748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanistic Reactivity Descriptors for the Prediction of Ames Mutagenicity of Primary Aromatic Amines.
Kuhnke L; Ter Laak A; Göller AH
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Feb; 59(2):668-672. PubMed ID: 30694664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in silico method for predicting Ames activities of primary aromatic amines by calculating the stabilities of nitrenium ions.
Bentzien J; Hickey ER; Kemper RA; Brewer ML; Dyekjaer JD; East SP; Whittaker M
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Feb; 50(2):274-97. PubMed ID: 20078034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines.
Devillers J; Mombelli E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):753-69. PubMed ID: 21120760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carbamates and ICH M7 classification: Making use of expert knowledge.
Hemingway R; Fowkes A; Williams RV
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 86():392-401. PubMed ID: 28385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of in silico systems and expert knowledge for structure-based assessment of potentially mutagenic impurities.
Sutter A; Amberg A; Boyer S; Brigo A; Contrera JF; Custer LL; Dobo KL; Gervais V; Glowienke S; van Gompel J; Greene N; Muster W; Nicolette J; Reddy MV; Thybaud V; Vock E; White AT; Müller L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 67(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 23669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration of structure-activity relationship and artificial intelligence systems to improve in silico prediction of ames test mutagenicity.
Mazzatorta P; Tran LA; Schilter B; Grigorov M
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17238246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.
Landry C; Kim MT; Kruhlak NL; Cross KP; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Stavitskaya L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 109():104488. PubMed ID: 31586682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutagenicity of aromatic amines and amides with chemical models for cytochrome P450 in Ames assay.
Inami K; Okazawa M; Mochizuki M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Sep; 23(6):986-91. PubMed ID: 19563884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
