106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542254)
1. Use of a new enzyme extraction system to improve the sensitivity of SOS/umu test and application to environmental samples.
Tian Z; Oda Y; Zhang Y; Yang M; Li H
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2015 Mar; 94(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 25542254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A microplate version of the SOS/umu-test for rapid detection of genotoxins and genotoxic potentials of environmental samples.
Reifferscheid G; Heil J; Oda Y; Zahn RK
Mutat Res; 1991 Dec; 253(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 1720196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the SOS/umu-test post-treatment assay for the detection of genotoxic activities of pure compounds and complex environmental mixtures.
Hamer B; Bihari N; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Müller WE; Batel R
Mutat Res; 2000 Mar; 466(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 10727903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Genotoxicity of soil irrigated by wastewater using umu/SOS test].
Yu G; Xiao RY; Wang CX; Wang ZJ
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Jun; 27(6):1162-5. PubMed ID: 16921954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a high-throughput umu-microplate test system for rapid detection of genotoxicity produced by mutagenic carcinogens and airborne particulate matter.
Oda Y; Funasaka K; Kitano M; Nakama A; Yoshikura T
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 14743341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Completely automated short-term genotoxicity testing for the assessment of chemicals and characterisation of contaminated soils and waste waters.
Brinkmann C; Eisentraeger A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 18504839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of genotoxic effects of surface waters using a battery of bioassays indicating different mode of action.
Han Y; Li N; Oda Y; Ma M; Rao K; Wang Z; Jin W; Hong G; Li Z; Luo Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Nov; 133():448-56. PubMed ID: 27517142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Salmonella sulA-test: a new in vitro system to detect genotoxins.
el Mzibri M; De Méo MP; Laget M; Guiraud H; Séree E; Barra Y; Duménil G
Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):195-208. PubMed ID: 8792838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of five nitro musk compounds for genotoxicity in the SOS chromotest and Salmonella mutagenicity.
Emig M; Reinhardt A; Mersch-Sundermann V
Toxicol Lett; 1996 Jun; 85(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 8644127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of 13 drinking water disinfection by-products using a microplate-based cytotoxicity assay and a developed SOS/umu assay.
Zhang SH; Miao DY; Tan L; Liu AL; Lu WQ
Mutagenesis; 2016 Jan; 31(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 26188195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increase of sensitivity and validity of the SOS/umu-test after replacement of the beta-galactosidase reporter gene with luciferase.
Schmid C; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Bachmann M
Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):9-16. PubMed ID: 9434838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construction and evaluation of a cea-lacZ gene fusion for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
Schumann W; Songür N; Miltenburger HG
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1991 Jul; 65(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 1916230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of transcriptional fusions with green fluorescent protein versus luciferase as reporters in bacterial mutagenicity tests.
Justus T; Thomas SM
Mutagenesis; 1999 Jul; 14(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 10390501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Salmonella (Ames) test, umu tests, and the SOS Chromotests for detecting genotoxins.
McDaniels AE; Reyes AL; Wymer LJ; Rankin CC; Stelma GN
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1990; 16(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 2209576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrochemical genotoxicity assay based on a SOS/umu test using hydrodynamic voltammetry in a droplet.
Kuramitz H; Sazawa K; Nanayama Y; Hata N; Taguchi S; Sugawara K; Fukushima M
Sensors (Basel); 2012 Dec; 12(12):17414-32. PubMed ID: 23242275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of SOS umu-test for the detection of genotoxic volatile chemicals and air pollutants.
Ong TM; Stewart J; Wen YF; Whong WZ
Environ Mutagen; 1987; 9(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 2434323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genotoxicity assessment of suspended particulate matter in the Elbe river: comparison of Salmonella microsome test, arabinose resistance test, and umu-test.
Vahl HH; Karbe L; Westendorf J
Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):81-93. PubMed ID: 9434847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotoxic risk identification of soil contamination at a major industrialized city in northeast China by a combination of in vitro and in vivo bioassays.
Xiao RY; Wang Z; Wang CX; Yu G; Zhu YG
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(19):6170-5. PubMed ID: 17051817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data.
Reifferscheid G; Heil J
Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):129-45. PubMed ID: 8792833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
