These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542254)

  • 1. Use of a new enzyme extraction system to improve the sensitivity of SOS/umu test and application to environmental samples.
    Tian Z; Oda Y; Zhang Y; Yang M; Li H
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2015 Mar; 94(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 25542254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A microplate version of the SOS/umu-test for rapid detection of genotoxins and genotoxic potentials of environmental samples.
    Reifferscheid G; Heil J; Oda Y; Zahn RK
    Mutat Res; 1991 Dec; 253(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 1720196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the SOS/umu-test post-treatment assay for the detection of genotoxic activities of pure compounds and complex environmental mixtures.
    Hamer B; Bihari N; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Müller WE; Batel R
    Mutat Res; 2000 Mar; 466(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 10727903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Genotoxicity of soil irrigated by wastewater using umu/SOS test].
    Yu G; Xiao RY; Wang CX; Wang ZJ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Jun; 27(6):1162-5. PubMed ID: 16921954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a high-throughput umu-microplate test system for rapid detection of genotoxicity produced by mutagenic carcinogens and airborne particulate matter.
    Oda Y; Funasaka K; Kitano M; Nakama A; Yoshikura T
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 14743341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completely automated short-term genotoxicity testing for the assessment of chemicals and characterisation of contaminated soils and waste waters.
    Brinkmann C; Eisentraeger A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 18504839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of genotoxic effects of surface waters using a battery of bioassays indicating different mode of action.
    Han Y; Li N; Oda Y; Ma M; Rao K; Wang Z; Jin W; Hong G; Li Z; Luo Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Nov; 133():448-56. PubMed ID: 27517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Salmonella sulA-test: a new in vitro system to detect genotoxins.
    el Mzibri M; De Méo MP; Laget M; Guiraud H; Séree E; Barra Y; Duménil G
    Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):195-208. PubMed ID: 8792838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of five nitro musk compounds for genotoxicity in the SOS chromotest and Salmonella mutagenicity.
    Emig M; Reinhardt A; Mersch-Sundermann V
    Toxicol Lett; 1996 Jun; 85(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 8644127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of 13 drinking water disinfection by-products using a microplate-based cytotoxicity assay and a developed SOS/umu assay.
    Zhang SH; Miao DY; Tan L; Liu AL; Lu WQ
    Mutagenesis; 2016 Jan; 31(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 26188195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increase of sensitivity and validity of the SOS/umu-test after replacement of the beta-galactosidase reporter gene with luciferase.
    Schmid C; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Bachmann M
    Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):9-16. PubMed ID: 9434838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construction and evaluation of a cea-lacZ gene fusion for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
    Schumann W; Songür N; Miltenburger HG
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1991 Jul; 65(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 1916230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of transcriptional fusions with green fluorescent protein versus luciferase as reporters in bacterial mutagenicity tests.
    Justus T; Thomas SM
    Mutagenesis; 1999 Jul; 14(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 10390501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Salmonella (Ames) test, umu tests, and the SOS Chromotests for detecting genotoxins.
    McDaniels AE; Reyes AL; Wymer LJ; Rankin CC; Stelma GN
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1990; 16(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 2209576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrochemical genotoxicity assay based on a SOS/umu test using hydrodynamic voltammetry in a droplet.
    Kuramitz H; Sazawa K; Nanayama Y; Hata N; Taguchi S; Sugawara K; Fukushima M
    Sensors (Basel); 2012 Dec; 12(12):17414-32. PubMed ID: 23242275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of SOS umu-test for the detection of genotoxic volatile chemicals and air pollutants.
    Ong TM; Stewart J; Wen YF; Whong WZ
    Environ Mutagen; 1987; 9(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 2434323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotoxicity assessment of suspended particulate matter in the Elbe river: comparison of Salmonella microsome test, arabinose resistance test, and umu-test.
    Vahl HH; Karbe L; Westendorf J
    Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):81-93. PubMed ID: 9434847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
    Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotoxic risk identification of soil contamination at a major industrialized city in northeast China by a combination of in vitro and in vivo bioassays.
    Xiao RY; Wang Z; Wang CX; Yu G; Zhu YG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(19):6170-5. PubMed ID: 17051817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data.
    Reifferscheid G; Heil J
    Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):129-45. PubMed ID: 8792833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.