These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542324)

  • 1. Systematic reviews.
    Milner KA
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2015 Jan; 42(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 25542324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinician's guide to systematic reviews.
    Crowther DM
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 28(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 23744820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews.
    van de Laar FA; Akkermans RP; van Binsbergen JJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug; 61(8):929-37. PubMed ID: 17251927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Schlesselman JJ; Collins JA
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 12806564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tutorial for writing systematic reviews for the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT).
    Mancini MC; Cardoso JR; Sampaio RF; Costa LC; Cabral CM; Costa LO
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2014; 18(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 25590440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [SR/PS-method for using data of primary studies from systematic reviews in the evaluation of health technologies].
    Gorenoi V; Hagen A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(5-6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25066352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.
    Elangovan S; Avila-Ortiz G; Johnson GK; Karimbux N; Allareddy V
    J Periodontol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 22509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of randomised trials in nephrology: theory and practice for interpreting level I evidence].
    Strippoli GF; Manno C; Schena FP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 14732915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews.
    Dunn AG; Arachi D; Hudgins J; Tsafnat G; Coiera E; Bourgeois FT
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 161(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 25285542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.