262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542517)
1. Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance.
van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1059-67. PubMed ID: 25542517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals.
van Lent M; Overbeke J; Out HJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104846. PubMed ID: 25118182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study.
van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e007961. PubMed ID: 26423849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
Lamb CR; Adams CA
Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.
Ross JS; Mulvey GK; Hines EM; Nissen SE; Krumholz HM
PLoS Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000144. PubMed ID: 19901971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trial registration in physical therapy journals: a cross-sectional study.
Babu AS; Veluswamy SK; Rao PT; Maiya AG
Phys Ther; 2014 Jan; 94(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 24009345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ
Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The percentage of articles which were accepted or rejected for publication in the Dutch Journal of Medicine in 1997].
Bloemenkamp DG; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jan; 143(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 10086132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?
Govender P; Buckley O; McAuley G; O'Brien J; Torreggiani WC
JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):231-4. PubMed ID: 19202995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.
Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA
Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The peer review process III: when the decision is made.
Riss P
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]