BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542517)

  • 1. Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance.
    van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1059-67. PubMed ID: 25542517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals.
    van Lent M; Overbeke J; Out HJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104846. PubMed ID: 25118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
    Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study.
    van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e007961. PubMed ID: 26423849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
    Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
    Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
    Rongen JJ; Hannink G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Ross JS; Mulvey GK; Hines EM; Nissen SE; Krumholz HM
    PLoS Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000144. PubMed ID: 19901971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical trial registration in physical therapy journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Babu AS; Veluswamy SK; Rao PT; Maiya AG
    Phys Ther; 2014 Jan; 94(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 24009345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
    Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ
    Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The percentage of articles which were accepted or rejected for publication in the Dutch Journal of Medicine in 1997].
    Bloemenkamp DG; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jan; 143(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 10086132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?
    Govender P; Buckley O; McAuley G; O'Brien J; Torreggiani WC
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):231-4. PubMed ID: 19202995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.
    Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The peer review process III: when the decision is made.
    Riss P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.