BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25542539)

  • 1. Author reply: To PMID 24491643.
    Coster DJ; Keane MC; Williams KA
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):e10-1. PubMed ID: 25542539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Author reply: To PMID 24491643.
    Coster DJ; Keane MC; Williams KA
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):e8-9. PubMed ID: 25542546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Author reply: To PMID 24794888.
    Patel SV; Armitage WJ; Claesson M
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):e11. PubMed ID: 25542540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Author reply: To PMID 24491643.
    Coster DJ; Keane MC; Williams KA
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Nov; 121(11):e62-3. PubMed ID: 25444945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Author reply: To PMID 24491643.
    Coster DJ; Keane MC; Williams KA
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct; 121(10):e59-60. PubMed ID: 25012935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keratoplasty outcomes: are we making advances?
    Patel SV; Armitage WJ; Claesson M
    Ophthalmology; 2014 May; 121(5):977-8. PubMed ID: 24794888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: Coster et al.: A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87).
    Baydoun L; Liarakos VS; Dapena I; Melles GR
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Nov; 121(11):e61-2. PubMed ID: 25444944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: Coster et al.: A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87).
    Somner JE; Hardman-Lea S; Bourne R; Burr J; Shah P
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):e9-10. PubMed ID: 25542547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: Coster et al.: A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87).
    Basu S; Hoshing A
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jan; 122(1):e7-8. PubMed ID: 25542545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: Coster et al.: a comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87).
    Kosker M
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct; 121(10):e59. PubMed ID: 25012932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study.
    Coster DJ; Lowe MT; Keane MC; Williams KA;
    Ophthalmology; 2014 May; 121(5):979-87. PubMed ID: 24491643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing Practice Patterns and Long-term Outcomes of Endothelial Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study.
    Dickman MM; Peeters JM; van den Biggelaar FJ; Ambergen TA; van Dongen MC; Kruit PJ; Nuijts RM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 170():133-142. PubMed ID: 27497603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-Year Review from 2005 through 2014.
    Park CY; Lee JK; Gore PK; Lim CY; Chuck RS
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Dec; 122(12):2432-42. PubMed ID: 26386848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection: current practice patterns of the Cornea Society (2011).
    Kharod-Dholakia B; Randleman JB; Bromley JG; Stulting RD
    Cornea; 2015 Jun; 34(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 25811719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: how to avoid complications.
    Price FW; Price MO; Arundhati A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 151(2):187-8.e2. PubMed ID: 21251490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in failed penetrating keratoplasty patients.
    Mifflin MD; Neuffer MC; Zaugg BE; Sikder S; Moshirfar M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 152(2):323-4; author reply 324-5. PubMed ID: 21784198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of anterior and posterior corneal surface irregularity in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Yamaguchi T; Negishi K; Yamaguchi K; Dogru M; Uchino Y; Shimmura S; Tsubota K
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1086-90. PubMed ID: 20567202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: a surgical strategy to minimize complications.
    Straiko MD; Terry MA; Shamie N
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 151(2):233-7.e2. PubMed ID: 21122829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.
    Heinzelmann S; Böhringer D; Eberwein P; Reinhard T; Maier P
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 254(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 26743748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current approaches to combat the shortage of corneal tissues: split-DMEK and double-split keratoplasty.
    Yoeruek E; Bartz Schmidt KU
    Cornea; 2015 Mar; 34(3):e6-9. PubMed ID: 25625361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.