These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25543280)

  • 1. Beware of docking!
    Chen YC
    Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 36(2):78-95. PubMed ID: 25543280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Docking techniques in pharmacology: How much promising?
    Gupta M; Sharma R; Kumar A
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Oct; 76():210-217. PubMed ID: 30067954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular dynamics in drug design.
    Zhao H; Caflisch A
    Eur J Med Chem; 2015 Feb; 91():4-14. PubMed ID: 25108504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In silico fragment-based drug discovery: setup and validation of a fragment-to-lead computational protocol using S4MPLE.
    Hoffer L; Renaud JP; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):836-51. PubMed ID: 23537132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design.
    Alonso H; Bliznyuk AA; Gready JE
    Med Res Rev; 2006 Sep; 26(5):531-68. PubMed ID: 16758486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational sampling of a cryptic drug binding site in a protein receptor: explicit solvent molecular dynamics and inhibitor docking to p38 MAP kinase.
    Frembgen-Kesner T; Elcock AH
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 359(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 16616932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of experimental design to optimize docking performance: the case of LiGenDock, the docking module of LiGen, a new de novo design program.
    Beato C; Beccari AR; Cavazzoni C; Lorenzi S; Costantino G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1503-17. PubMed ID: 23590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge-Based Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction Accuracy for Lead Optimization.
    Gao C; Thorsteinson N; Watson I; Wang J; Vieth M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1460-8. PubMed ID: 26090547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
    Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cross docking pipeline for improving pose prediction and virtual screening performance.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):163-173. PubMed ID: 28836076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receptor-based virtual screening protocol for drug discovery.
    Cerqueira NM; Gesto D; Oliveira EF; Santos-Martins D; Brás NF; Sousa SF; Fernandes PA; Ramos MJ
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Sep; 582():56-67. PubMed ID: 26045247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating replacement free energy of binding-site waters in molecular docking.
    Sun H; Zhao L; Peng S; Huang N
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):1765-76. PubMed ID: 24549784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ProSelection: A Novel Algorithm to Select Proper Protein Structure Subsets for in Silico Target Identification and Drug Discovery Research.
    Wang N; Wang L; Xie XQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2686-2698. PubMed ID: 29016123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The MPSim-Dock hierarchical docking algorithm: application to the eight trypsin inhibitor cocrystals.
    Cho AE; Wendel JA; Vaidehi N; Kekenes-Huskey PM; Floriano WB; Maiti PK; Goddard WA
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Jan; 26(1):48-71. PubMed ID: 15529328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Docking Programs Work.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():35-50. PubMed ID: 31452097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010-2011 in review.
    Yuriev E; Ramsland PA
    J Mol Recognit; 2013 May; 26(5):215-39. PubMed ID: 23526775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic and efficient side chain optimization for molecular docking using a cheapest-path procedure.
    Schumann M; Armen RS
    J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(14):1258-69. PubMed ID: 23420703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.