These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25543387)

  • 41. Tilted disc syndrome may mimic false visual field deterioration.
    Vuori ML; Mäntyjärvi M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 18162059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of multifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry test results.
    Aychoua N; Junoy Montolio FG; Jansonius NM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 131(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23430147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Burden of moderate visual impairment in an urban population in southern India.
    Dandona L; Dandona R; Naduvilath TJ; McCarty CA; Srinivas M; Mandal P; Nanda A; Rao GN
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 10080205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions.
    Bachmann G; Fahle M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Wide-field fundus autofluorescence abnormalities and visual function in patients with cone and cone-rod dystrophies.
    Oishi M; Oishi A; Ogino K; Makiyama Y; Gotoh N; Kurimoto M; Yoshimura N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3572-7. PubMed ID: 24845635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Visual acuity and pattern of visual field loss at presentation in pituitary adenoma.
    Ogra S; Nichols AD; Stylli S; Kaye AH; Savino PJ; Danesh-Meyer HV
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 May; 21(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 24656736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrast sensitivity loss in the peripheral visual field following laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1120-2. PubMed ID: 17531714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Natural course of visual field loss in patients with Type 2 Usher syndrome.
    Fishman GA; Bozbeyoglu S; Massof RW; Kimberling W
    Retina; 2007 Jun; 27(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 17558323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.
    Virgili G; Pierrottet C; Parmeggiani F; Pennino M; Giacomelli G; Steindler P; Menchini U; Orzalesi N;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Relationship between visual acuity and nasal field thresholds in patients with temporal hemianopia.
    Manor RS; Dickerman Z
    J Clin Neuroophthalmol; 1991 Mar; 11(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 1827465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of different levels of intraocular stray light on kinetic perimetry findings.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Isono K; Tsuchiya M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127159. PubMed ID: 25965816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of macular thickness measurements for detection of band atrophy of the optic nerve using optical coherence tomography.
    Moura FC; Medeiros FA; Monteiro ML
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17070583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Clinico-statistical study on availability of Esterman disability score for assessment of mobility difficulty in patients with visual field loss].
    Yamagata Y; Terada Y; Suzuki A; Mimura O
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Jan; 114(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20112800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Proposed scoring system for assessment of functional impairment due to visual field defects].
    Weber J; Schiefer U; Kolling G
    Ophthalmologe; 2004 Oct; 101(10):1030-3. PubMed ID: 15338183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of age on the central isopter of the normal visual field.
    Drance SM; Berry V; Hughes A
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1967 Apr; 2(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 6035157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Guideline development for the evaluation of visual impairment in Korea.
    Chin HS; Park SH; Park IK; Kwon JW; Lee SJ;
    J Korean Med Sci; 2009 May; 24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S252-7. PubMed ID: 19503681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quantitative and functional visual field outcomes after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary adenectomy.
    Parikh D; Robins JMW; Garretty T; Sheikh AJ; Tyagi AK; Nix PA; Phillips NI
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Jun; 164(6):1605-1614. PubMed ID: 35426509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cartographic deformations in a parabolic visual field map.
    Lindblom B
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Dec; 66(6):718-20. PubMed ID: 3232516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.