These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25543400)
1. [Assessment of detective quantum efficiency of digital X-ray detectors under conditions of clinics]. Zelikman MI; Kruchinin SA Med Tekh; 2014; (5):41-3. PubMed ID: 25543400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Software for assessment of detective quantum efficiency of digital X-ray detectors]. Kruchinin SA; Zelikman MI Med Tekh; 2014; (5):37-40. PubMed ID: 25543399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Multislice scanners and radiation dose. Mahesh M; Hevezi JM J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19179243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography: the most important advancement in radiography since the discovery of x-rays. Stanley JH Stand News; 1995 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10160504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols. Heggie JC; Kay JK; Lee WK Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 16732832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Is the CT Dose Check Standard, and Why Do CT Scanners Need to Be in Compliance? Mahesh M J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jan; 13(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 26653798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. FDA speaks out on the Steris System 1 and on CT dose risks--ECRI institute responds. Health Devices; 2010 Jan; 39(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 20143661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance in CT. Stein KM Radiol Technol; 2000; 72(1):67. PubMed ID: 11019412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging. Bansal GJ Postgrad Med J; 2006 Jul; 82(969):425-8. PubMed ID: 16822918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiology. Second thoughts about CT imaging. Schenkman L Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6020):1002-4. PubMed ID: 21350139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. CT radiation dose and image quality. Payne JT Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reception still fuzzy for fast CT scans of the heart. As technology for seeing into the heart improves, how the new machines will be used is still up in the air. Harv Heart Lett; 2007 Jun; 17(10):4. PubMed ID: 17654798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of an automatic dose control system for CT: specifications and basic phantom tests. Nagel HD; Stumpp P; Kahn T; Gosch D Rofo; 2011 Jan; 183(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 20938882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance in CT with the Belgian protocol and the new European acceptability criteria. Bosmans H; Lemmens K; Malone J; Oyen R Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 23233502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A study of parameters of scanning roentgenographic systems]. Blinov NN; Gurzhiev AN; Gurzhiev SN; Kirichenko MG; Kostritskiĭ AV Med Tekh; 2004; (5):8-11. PubMed ID: 15568504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting a new PET/CT system. Madsen MT J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 May; 1(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 17411602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A proposed protocol for acceptance and constancy control of computed tomography systems: a Nordic Association for Clinical Physics (NACP) work group report. Kuttner S; Bujila R; Kortesniemi M; Andersson H; Kull L; Østerås BH; Thygesen J; Tarp IS Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 23160544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]