647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25543606)
1. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Soft tissue linear evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance treatment and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 25938157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.
Jena AK; Duggal R
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 20050741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Pancherz's analysis in evaluating the treatment effects of headgear-activator on skeletal Class II divison 1 malocclusion].
Zhang JM; Chen HY; Zhang L
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 25(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 18306625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Radwan ES; Maher A; Montasser MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 37073934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Sidlauskas A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion in an adolescent patient, treated with a novel sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance.
Li P; Feng J; Shen G; Zhao N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):153-66. PubMed ID: 27364217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
Luo Y; Fang G
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin Block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study.
Saikoski LZ; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 24713558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.
Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the maxillary basal bone and molar change of skeletal Class II malocclusion treated by sagittal-guidance Twin-block].
Yi YY; Zhao N; Shen G
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 25(4):456-460. PubMed ID: 27858070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
