These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25543606)
1. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Soft tissue linear evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance treatment and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion]. Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 25938157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Baysal A; Uysal T Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion. Jena AK; Duggal R Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 20050741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Pancherz's analysis in evaluating the treatment effects of headgear-activator on skeletal Class II divison 1 malocclusion]. Zhang JM; Chen HY; Zhang L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 25(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 18306625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Radwan ES; Maher A; Montasser MA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 37073934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Toth LR; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Sidlauskas A Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion in an adolescent patient, treated with a novel sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance. Li P; Feng J; Shen G; Zhao N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):153-66. PubMed ID: 27364217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients]. Luo Y; Fang G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects. Gao W; Li X; Bai Y Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin Block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study. Saikoski LZ; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 24713558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction. Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports. Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the maxillary basal bone and molar change of skeletal Class II malocclusion treated by sagittal-guidance Twin-block]. Yi YY; Zhao N; Shen G Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 25(4):456-460. PubMed ID: 27858070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]