382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25544104)
1. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of preparation design on fracture strength of compromised molars restored with direct composite resin restorations: An in vitro and finite element analysis study.
Hofsteenge JW; Carvalho MA; Botenga ELF; Cune MS; Özcan M; Magne P; Gresnigt MMM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1150-1158. PubMed ID: 38670907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays.
Zuellig-Singer R; Krejci I; Lutz F
J Dent Res; 1992 Nov; 71(11):1842-6. PubMed ID: 1401449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal integrity in minimally invasive molar resin composite restorations: Impact of polymerization shrinkage.
Weimann D; Fleck C; Razi H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106554. PubMed ID: 38676971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays.
Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Mar; 19(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 1517872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of internal angle and shape of the lining on residual stress of Class II molar restorations.
Zuo Q; Li A; Teng H; Liu Z
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Apr; 27(5):680-688. PubMed ID: 38229450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct composite resin inlay.
Biederman JD
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Sep; 62(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 2681690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Co-Influence of Restoration Bonding and Inlay Cavity Design on Fracture Load of Restored Tooth.
Yli-Urpo T; Lassila L; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 37549134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations.
Lutz F; Krejci I; Barbakow F
Dent Mater; 1991 Apr; 7(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 1936638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different deep margin elevation methods on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations.
Balci ŞN; Tekçe N; Tuncer S; Demirci M
Am J Dent; 2024 Jun; 37(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 38899989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
Hasegawa EA; Boyer DB; Chan DC
Dent Mater; 1989 Nov; 5(6):388-91. PubMed ID: 2700973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of retainer design and number of inlay boxes on the biomechanical behavior of zirconia cantilever resin bonded fixed dental prosthesis.
Kasem AT; Abo-Madina M; Al-Zordk W
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):652-662. PubMed ID: 37737460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress analysis of cemented or resin-bonded loaded porcelain inlays.
Dérand T
Dent Mater; 1991 Jan; 7(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2015995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing marginal leakage of posterior composite resin restorations: a review of clinical techniques.
Cheung GS
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 2407825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vitro Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance in Inlay Restoration Prepared with CAD-CAM and Different Systems in the Primary Teeth.
Simsek H; Derelioglu S
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4292761. PubMed ID: 27830145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cavity convergence angles for direct composite inlays.
Wassell RW; Walls AW; McCabe JF
J Dent; 1992 Oct; 20(5):294-7. PubMed ID: 1452867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical reinforcement by CAD-CAM materials affects stress distributions of posterior composite bridges: 3D finite element analysis.
Elraggal A; Abdelraheem IM; Watts DC; Roy S; Dommeti VK; Alshabib A; Althaqafi KA; Afifi RR
Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):869-877. PubMed ID: 38609774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives.
Burgoyne AR; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 2051355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The plane of fracture and shear bond strength of three composite inlay systems.
Scott JA; Strang R; Saunders WP
Dent Mater; 1992 May; 8(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 1521712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
