782 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25544104)
21. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
Browning WD; Safirstein J
Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses.
Magne P; Douglas WH
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11203619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerization process in dental restorations.
Barink M; Van der Mark PC; Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Verdonschot N
Biomaterials; 2003 Apr; 24(8):1427-35. PubMed ID: 12527284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing.
Dietschi D; Herzfeld D
Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1033-42. PubMed ID: 9879916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Polymerization contraction stress of resin composite restorations in a model Class I cavity configuration using photoelastic analysis.
Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(6):309-19. PubMed ID: 14743526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations.
Winkler MM; Katona TR; Paydar NH
J Dent Res; 1996 Jul; 75(7):1477-83. PubMed ID: 8876599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays.
Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Mar; 19(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 1517872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques.
Liberman R; Ben-Amar A; Herteanu L; Judes H
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9049916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Indirect posterior restorations using a new chairside microhybrid resin composite system.
Tay FR; Wei SH
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 11317389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
Bott B; Hannig M
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.
Pallesen U; Qvist V
Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Jun; 7(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 12740693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
Roulet JF
J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations.
van Dijken JW
Acta Odontol Scand; 1994 Dec; 52(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 7887146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
