239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25544478)
21. Evaluation of bioabsorbable seamguard for staple line reinforcement in stapled rectal anastomoses.
Fajardo AD; Amador-Ortiz C; Chun J; Stewart D; Fleshman JW
Surg Innov; 2012 Sep; 19(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 22158845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Fluorescence angiography in the detection of anastomotic perfusion during rectal and sigmoid resection - preliminary report].
Škrovina M; Benčurik V; Holášková E; Bartoš J; Klos K; Macháčková M; Anděl P
Rozhl Chir; 2016; 95(10):354-358. PubMed ID: 27879140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [C-seal for prevention of anastomotic leakage following colorectal anastomosis].
Morks AN; Havenga K; ten Cate Hoedemaker HO; Ploeg RJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155():A2812. PubMed ID: 21447208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model to predict multiple firings in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis.
Cai ZH; Zhang Q; Fu ZW; Fingerhut A; Tan JW; Zang L; Dong F; Li SC; Wang SL; Ma JJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jan; 29(3):536-548. PubMed ID: 36688017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A novel colorectal anastomotic method in natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer.
Chen ZZ; Huang W; Chai NH; Qiu YH; Wei ZQ
Surg Today; 2022 Aug; 52(8):1202-1211. PubMed ID: 35546641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Randomized clinical trial of biodegradeable intraluminal sheath to prevent anastomotic leak after stapled colorectal anastomosis.
Bakker IS; Morks AN; Ten Cate Hoedemaker HO; Burgerhof JGM; Leuvenink HG; van Praagh JB; Ploeg RJ; Havenga K;
Br J Surg; 2017 Jul; 104(8):1010-1019. PubMed ID: 28488729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of pressure resistance of double-rows and triple-rows circular stapler in rectal double stapling technique: In vitro study.
Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(28):e29600. PubMed ID: 35839009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reinforcement of the colon anastomosis with cyanoacrylate glue: a porcine model.
Boersema GSA; Vennix S; Wu Z; Te Lintel Hekkert M; Duncker DGM; Lam KH; Menon AG; Kleinrensink GJ; Lange JF
J Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 217():84-91. PubMed ID: 28595813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum using a triple stapled intracorporeal anastomosis in the pig.
Fleshman JW; Brunt LM; Fry RD; Birnbaum EH; Simmang CL; Mazor A; Soper N; Freeman L; Kodner IJ
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1993 Apr; 3(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 8269231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.
Fingerhut A; Elhadad A; Hay JM; Lacaine F; Flamant Y
Surgery; 1994 Sep; 116(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 8079178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Strength of Anastomosis Between Four Different Techniques for Colorectal Surgery.
Tomori K; Eto K; Haruki K; Sugano H; Imaizumi Y; Kumamoto T; Takada N; Shimoyama Y; Yanaga K
Anticancer Res; 2020 Apr; 40(4):1891-1896. PubMed ID: 32234877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with side-to-end anastomosis in a patient with anal stenosis.
Tajima Y; Hanai T; Katsuno H; Masumori K; Koide Y; Ashida K; Matsuoka H; Hiro J; Endo T; Kamiya T; Chong Y; Maeda K; Uyama I
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 33441169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Poly-ϵ-caprolactone scaffold as staple-line reinforcement of rectal anastomosis: an experimental piglet study.
Petersen LLK; Dursun MD; Madsen G; Le DQS; Möller S; Qvist N; Ellebæk MB
BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):112. PubMed ID: 38491416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic anterior resection: new anastomosis technique in a pig model.
Bedirli A; Yucel D; Ekim B
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transanal drainage tube placement to prevent anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery with double stapling reconstruction.
Matsuda M; Tsuruta M; Hasegawa H; Okabayashi K; Kondo T; Shimada T; Yahagi M; Yoshikawa Y; Kitagawa Y
Surg Today; 2016 May; 46(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 26231480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.
Neutzling CB; Lustosa SA; Proenca IM; da Silva EM; Matos D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003144. PubMed ID: 22336786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage.
Kitaguchi D; Ito M
Ann Coloproctol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 36593572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Delayed transanal repair of persistent coloanal anastomotic leak in diverted patients after resection for rectal cancer.
Blumetti J; Chaudhry V; Prasad L; Abcarian H
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1238-41. PubMed ID: 22229958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
