These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25544551)

  • 1. Prediction-driven matched molecular pairs to interpret QSARs and aid the molecular optimization process.
    Sushko Y; Novotarskyi S; Körner R; Vogt J; Abdelaziz A; Tetko IV
    J Cheminform; 2014; 6(1):48. PubMed ID: 25544551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QSAR-assisted-MMPA to expand chemical transformation space for lead optimization.
    Fu L; Yang ZY; Yang ZJ; Yin MZ; Lu AP; Chen X; Liu S; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models of chemical transformations from matched pairs analyses.
    Beck JM; Springer C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Apr; 54(4):1226-34. PubMed ID: 24605924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Derivation of a Matched Molecular Pairs Based ADME/Tox Knowledge Base for Compound Optimization.
    Lumley JA; Desai P; Wang J; Cahya S; Zhang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4757-4771. PubMed ID: 32975944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transformer-based molecular optimization beyond matched molecular pairs.
    He J; Nittinger E; Tyrchan C; Czechtizky W; Patronov A; Bjerrum EJ; Engkvist O
    J Cheminform; 2022 Mar; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 35346368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semi-automated workflow for molecular pair analysis and QSAR-assisted transformation space expansion.
    Yang ZY; Fu L; Lu AP; Liu S; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    J Cheminform; 2021 Nov; 13(1):86. PubMed ID: 34774096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiobjective optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationships: deriving accurate and interpretable QSARs.
    Nicolotti O; Gillet VJ; Fleming PJ; Green DV
    J Med Chem; 2002 Nov; 45(23):5069-80. PubMed ID: 12408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-Silico Extraction of Design Ideas Using MMPA-by-QSAR and its Application on ADME Endpoints.
    Koutsoukas A; Chang G; Keefer CE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):477-485. PubMed ID: 30497262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-Target QSAR Approaches for Modeling Protein Inhibitors. Simultaneous Prediction of Activities Against Biomacromolecules Present in Gram-Negative Bacteria.
    Speck-Planche A; Cordeiro MN
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2015; 15(18):1801-13. PubMed ID: 25961517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective Prediction of Antitarget Activity by Matched Molecular Pairs Analysis.
    Warner DJ; Bridgland-Taylor MH; Sefton CE; Wood DJ
    Mol Inform; 2012 May; 31(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 27477265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review.
    Verma J; Khedkar VM; Coutinho EC
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2010; 10(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 19929826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the QSAR's predictive truthfulness of the novel N-tuple discrete derivative indices on benchmark datasets.
    Martínez-Santiago O; Marrero-Ponce Y; Vivas-Reyes R; Rivera-Borroto OM; Hurtado E; Treto-Suarez MA; Ramos Y; Vergara-Murillo F; Orozco-Ugarriza ME; Martínez-López Y
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 May; 28(5):367-389. PubMed ID: 28590848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical Analysis of Bioactive Matched Molecular Pairs, Encoded Chemical Transformations, and Associated Substructures.
    Hu Y; Bajorath J
    Mol Inform; 2016 Oct; 35(10):483-488. PubMed ID: 27573350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of compound potency changes in matched molecular pairs using support vector regression.
    de la Vega de León A; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2654-63. PubMed ID: 25191787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodology of aiQSAR: a group-specific approach to QSAR modelling.
    Vukovic K; Gadaleta D; Benfenati E
    J Cheminform; 2019 Apr; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 30945010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Essential and desirable characteristics of ecotoxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Schultz TW; Cronin MT
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Mar; 22(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 12627648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.
    Martin E; Mukherjee P; Sullivan D; Jansen J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 21667971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural and Physico-Chemical Interpretation (SPCI) of QSAR Models and Its Comparison with Matched Molecular Pair Analysis.
    Polishchuk P; Tinkov O; Khristova T; Ognichenko L; Kosinskaya A; Varnek A; Kuz'min V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1455-69. PubMed ID: 27419846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D-MoRSE descriptors explained.
    Devinyak O; Havrylyuk D; Lesyk R
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Nov; 54():194-203. PubMed ID: 25459771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.