These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25544726)

  • 1. A bilateral analysis scheme for false positive reduction in mammogram mass detection.
    Li Y; Chen H; Yang Y; Cheng L; Cao L
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Feb; 57():84-95. PubMed ID: 25544726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
    Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
    Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1642-54. PubMed ID: 10501064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
    Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.
    Singh S; Tourassi GD; Baker JA; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3626-36. PubMed ID: 18777923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Mazurowski MA; Lo JY; Harrawood BP; Tourassi GD
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Oct; 44(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 21554985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local Binary Patterns Descriptor Based on Sparse Curvelet Coefficients for False-Positive Reduction in Mammograms.
    Pawar MM; Talbar SN; Dudhane A
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():5940436. PubMed ID: 30356422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of masses based on asymmetric regions of digital bilateral mammograms using spatial description with variogram and cross-variogram functions.
    Ericeira DR; Silva AC; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Sep; 43(8):987-99. PubMed ID: 23816171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
    Tourassi GD; Vargas-Voracek R; Catarious DM; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 1961160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving mass candidate detection in mammograms via feature maxima propagation and local feature selection.
    Melendez J; Sánchez CI; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081904. PubMed ID: 25086535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Minaei B; Domingues I
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 24518702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.
    Sanjay-Gopal S; Chan HP; Wilson T; Helvie M; Petrick N; Sahiner B
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10619252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
    Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.