158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25546279)
1. Residents' preferences for household kitchen waste source separation services in Beijing: a choice experiment approach.
Yuan Y; Yabe M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Dec; 12(1):176-90. PubMed ID: 25546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the public preferences for solid waste management programmes using choice experiments in Macao.
Jin J; Wang Z; Ran S
Waste Manag Res; 2006 Aug; 24(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 16941989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Choice experiment method and its application to solid waste management in Macao].
Jin JJ; Wang ZS
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Apr; 27(4):820-4. PubMed ID: 16768014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residents' behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau.
Song Q; Wang Z; Li J
J Environ Manage; 2012 Sep; 106():8-16. PubMed ID: 22562006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A choice experiment of the residential preference of waste management services - the example of Kagoshima city, Japan.
Sakata Y
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 16716583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Willingness to pay for improving the residential waste disposal system in Korea: a choice experiment study.
Ku SJ; Yoo SH; Kwak SJ
Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 44(2):278-87. PubMed ID: 19548022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel bulk density-based recognition method for kitchen and dry waste: A case study in Beijing, China.
Li Z; Wang Q; Zhang T; Wang H; Chen T
Waste Manag; 2020 Aug; 114():89-95. PubMed ID: 32659691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the new municipal solid waste management regulation promote residents' waste separation behaviour? Evidence from survey data in Beijing, China.
Lu C; Yi X; Zou Y
Waste Manag Res; 2024 Jul; 42(7):556-568. PubMed ID: 37804124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating source separation of plastic waste using conjoint analysis.
Nakatani J; Aramaki T; Hanaki K
Waste Manag; 2008 Nov; 28(11):2393-402. PubMed ID: 18207727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the social dimensions in public participation in rural domestic waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China.
Ma J; Hipel KW; Hanson ML
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Dec; 190(1):35. PubMed ID: 29264731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Source separation of household waste: a case study in China.
Zhuang Y; Wu SW; Wang YL; Wu WX; Chen YX
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(10):2022-30. PubMed ID: 17920856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Municipal household solid waste fee based on an increasing block pricing model in Beijing, China.
Chu Z; Wu Y; Zhuang J
Waste Manag Res; 2017 Mar; 35(3):228-235. PubMed ID: 28219297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public opinion about the source separation of municipal solid waste in Shanghai, China.
Zhang W; Che Y; Yang K; Ren X; Tai J
Waste Manag Res; 2012 Dec; 30(12):1261-71. PubMed ID: 23045226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing foodservice waste: going green can save green.
McCaffree J
J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 19167945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A research study into the requirements of disabled residents for rehabilitation services in Beijing.
Zongjie Y; Hong D; Zhongxin X; Hui X
Disabil Rehabil; 2007 May; 29(10):825-33. PubMed ID: 17457741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring residents' attitudes and willingness to pay for solid waste management in Macau.
Song Q; Wang Z; Li J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Aug; 23(16):16456-62. PubMed ID: 27164886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The collection system for residential recyclables in communities in Haidian District, Beijing: a possible approach for China recycling.
Wang J; Han L; Li S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1672-80. PubMed ID: 17967528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges.
Zhang DQ; Tan SK; Gersberg RM
J Environ Manage; 2010 Aug; 91(8):1623-33. PubMed ID: 20413209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.
Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19833498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk perception and public acceptance toward a highly protested Waste-to-Energy facility.
Ren X; Che Y; Yang K; Tao Y
Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():528-539. PubMed ID: 26577458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
