These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25547072)

  • 21. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8700766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A competing risk survival analysis model to assess the efficacy of filling carious primary teeth.
    Stephenson J; Chadwick BL; Playle RA; Treasure ET
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 20516690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure.
    Kopperud SE; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Dec; 120(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 23167471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
    Dammaschke T; Nykiel K; Sagheri D; Schäfer E
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 23890259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population.
    van Gemert-Schriks MC; van Amerongen WE; ten Cate JM; Aartman IH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Dec; 11(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 17710452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Clinical pattern of secondary dental caries in relation to tissue defect class and type of filling material].
    Krupiński J; Krupińska A; Lejman L; Modelska D; Roterman I; Sciegienny-Malec J; Rutkowska H
    Czas Stomatol; 1990 Oct; 43(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 2104302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites.
    van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
    J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One-year evaluation of two hybrid composites placed in a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Beck F; Dumitrescu N; König F; Graf A; Bauer P; Sperr W; Moritz A; Schedle A
    Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):824-38. PubMed ID: 24946982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.
    Ernst CP; Canbek K; Aksogan K; Willershausen B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Sep; 7(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12898294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Restorative treatment of deciduous teeth].
    Frankenmolen FW; Roeters FJ; Weerheijm KL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):458-60. PubMed ID: 11921991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.
    Demirci M; Tuncer S; Öztaş E; Tekçe N; Uysal Ö
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2187-99. PubMed ID: 25802222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2015 May; 31(5):481-95. PubMed ID: 25773188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Composite resin support of undermined enamel in amalgam restorations.
    Eidelman E
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 10197337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
    Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up.
    Frese C; Schiller P; Staehle HJ; Wolff D
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):979-85. PubMed ID: 23954577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.