248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25549084)
1. Dwell time modulation restrictions do not necessarily improve treatment plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Balvert M; Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 25549084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast mixed integer optimization (FMIO) for high dose rate brachytherapy.
Antaki M; L Deufel C; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(21):215005. PubMed ID: 33283763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation of a 2D diode array in "magic phantom" for use in high dose rate brachytherapy pretreatment quality assurance.
Espinoza A; Petasecca M; Fuduli I; Howie A; Bucci J; Corde S; Jackson M; Lerch ML; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):663-673. PubMed ID: 28102606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mixed integer programming improves comprehensibility and plan quality in inverse optimization of prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):1041-57. PubMed ID: 23363622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous needle catheter selection and dwell time optimization for preplanning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Wang C; Gonzalez Y; Shen C; Hrycushko B; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(5):055028. PubMed ID: 33264753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of HDR brachytherapy dose distributions using linear programming with penalty costs.
Alterovitz R; Lessard E; Pouliot J; Hsu IC; O'Brien JF; Goldberg K
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4012-9. PubMed ID: 17153381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Derivation of in vivo source tracking error thresholds for TRUS-based HDR prostate brachytherapy through simulation of source positioning errors.
Poder J; Carrara M; Howie A; Cutajar D; Bucci J; Rosenfeld A
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(5):711-719. PubMed ID: 31175015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the dosimetric coverage of interstitial high-dose-rate breast implants.
Kestin LL; Jaffray DA; Edmundson GK; Martinez AA; Wong JW; Kini VR; Chen PY; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10656370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric impact of inter-observer catheter reconstruction variability in ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Nicolae A; Murgic J; Kruljac I; Dubnitzky L; D'Alimonte L; Lu L; Cumal A; Law N; Morton G; Loblaw A; Chung HT; Ravi A
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):306-312. PubMed ID: 29239812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of three-dimensional radiation therapy planning tools and intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate high dose rate prostate brachytherapy implants.
Kini VR; Edmundson GK; Vicini FA; Jaffray DA; Gustafson G; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Feb; 43(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 10078639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for restricting intracatheter dwell time variance in high-dose-rate brachytherapy plan optimization.
Cunha A; Siauw T; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 26727333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of using linear optimization models in dose planning for HDR brachytherapy.
Holm A; Larsson T; Carlsson Tedgren A
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1021-8. PubMed ID: 22320812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrated system for clinical treatment verification of HDR prostate brachytherapy combining source tracking with pretreatment imaging.
Smith RL; Hanlon M; Panettieri V; Millar JL; Matheson B; Haworth A; Franich RD
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):111-121. PubMed ID: 28958735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of prostate catheter displacement in inverse planning--simulated annealing and geometric optimization.
Reynés-Llompart G; Pino F; Modolell I; Gullón C; Pera J; Gutierrez C; Picón C
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 26612698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
