BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25549164)

  • 21. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
    Poulsen T; Oakley S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of air-conduction and bone-conduction hearing thresholds for pure tones and octave-band filtered sound effects.
    Abouchacra KS; Letowski T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):422-8. PubMed ID: 10813642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds.
    Almeida BP; Menezes Pde L; Andrade KC; Teixeira CF
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(6):642-6. PubMed ID: 26454532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions.
    Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults.
    Stuart A; Stenstrom R; Tompkins C; Vandenhoff S
    Audiology; 1991; 30(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 1877901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones.
    Lo AH; McPherson B
    BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2013 May; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 23705872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone.
    Van der Aerschot M; Swanepoel de W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh HC; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):616-22. PubMed ID: 27610920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.
    Frank T
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Supra-aural transducer-related artifact contributes to overestimation of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Bhatt IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2055. PubMed ID: 29716271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reference hearing threshold levels for short duration signals.
    Poulsen T; Legarth SV
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):665-74. PubMed ID: 18923987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli.
    John AB; Kreisman BM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):635-642. PubMed ID: 28388868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.