BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25549755)

  • 1. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy.
    Liu H; Wang FL; Zhao YM; Yao YQ; Li YL
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 25549755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
    Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
    Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
    Sanam M; Majid MM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].
    Leng X; Wang M; Zhang SL; Wang D; Cao W; Yang XH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):891-5. PubMed ID: 24495679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is pipelle biopsy really adequate for diagnosing endometrial disease?
    Tanriverdi HA; Barut A; Gün BD; Kaya E
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10(6):CR271-4. PubMed ID: 15173672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C).
    Demirkiran F; Yavuz E; Erenel H; Bese T; Arvas M; Sanioglu C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 22766754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy.
    Gungorduk K; Asicioglu O; Ertas IE; Ozdemir IA; Ulker MM; Yildirim G; Ataser G; Sanci M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 25423700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
    Piatek S; Warzecha D; Kisielewski F; Szymusik I; Panek G; Wielgos M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient endometrial sampling with the Pipelle curette.
    Ben-Baruch G; Seidman DS; Schiff E; Moran O; Menczer J
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994; 37(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 8050731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator.
    Kaunitz AM; Masciello A; Ostrowski M; Rovira EZ
    J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 3385697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.
    Goldchmit R; Katz Z; Blickstein I; Caspi B; Dgani R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 8414316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combination of vaginal ultrasonography and pipelle sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial disease.
    Kavak Z; Ceyhan N; Pekin S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 36(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8775255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Pipelle Endometrial Sampling versus Classical Dilatation and Curettage: A Three-Year Observational Study.
    Rezk M; Sayyed T; Dawood R
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(6):537-542. PubMed ID: 26928973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk Factors for Unsuccessful Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy: A Comparative Study of Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy (Pipelle) and Diagnostic Dilation and Curettage.
    Xie B; Qian C; Yang B; Ning C; Yao X; Du Y; Shi Y; Luo X; Chen X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):724-729. PubMed ID: 29223698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
    Yang GC; Wan LS
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of biopsy strategies for endometrial cancer diagnosis in women with postmenopausal bleeding: Pipelle sampling curette versus dilatation & curettage.
    Yi Y; Bryce CL; Adambekov S; Edwards RP; Goughnour SL; Linkov F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 29747864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endometrial sampling devices for early diagnosis of endometrial lesions.
    Du J; Li Y; Lv S; Wang Q; Sun C; Dong X; He M; Ulain Q; Yuan Y; Tuo X; Batchu N; Song Q; Li Q
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 142(12):2515-2522. PubMed ID: 27515060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.