These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25549787)

  • 1. Optimal loads for a 30-s maximal power cycle ergometer test using a stationary start.
    Vargas NT; Robergs RA; Klopp DM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 May; 115(5):1087-94. PubMed ID: 25549787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of peak power and short-term work capacity.
    MacIntosh BR; Rishaug P; Svedahl K
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Feb; 88(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 12560957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimized versus corrected peak power during friction-braked cycle ergometry in males and females.
    James DV; Wood DM; Maberly TC; De Ste Croix M
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Jun; 25(8):859-67. PubMed ID: 17474039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open-ended time durations for stationary start intense cycle ergometer exercise testing.
    Klopp DM; Vargas NT; Robergs RA
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2013 May; 38(5):574-80. PubMed ID: 23668767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal load for a torque-velocity relationship test during cycling.
    Krüger RL; Peyrard A; di Domenico H; Rupp T; Millet GY; Samozino P
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Nov; 120(11):2455-2466. PubMed ID: 32816143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Coleman SG; Hale T
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1998 Aug; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 9677437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of the optimal load setting for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women.
    Forbes SC; Kennedy MD; Boule NB; Bell G
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 35(10):835-9. PubMed ID: 24920563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison RC; Doherty M; Smith P
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Jul; 22(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 15370497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low sampling rates bias outcomes from the Wingate test.
    Santos EL; Novaes JS; Reis VM; Giannella-Neto A
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 31(11):784-9. PubMed ID: 20812165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variable resistance loadings in anaerobic power testing.
    Gastin P; Lawson D; Hargreaves M; Carey M; Fairweather I
    Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 1797691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modification of the Wingate anaerobic power test for rowing: optimization of the resistance setting.
    Mandic S; Quinney HA; Bell GJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 25(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 15346227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of a 6-s maximal cycling sprint test.
    Mendez-Villanueva A; Bishop D; Hamer P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2007 Oct; 10(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 16949868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences of intermittent elbow flexion power using various loads.
    Yamaji S; Demura S; Yamamoto K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):629-42. PubMed ID: 19093623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Force-velocity test on a stationary cycle ergometer: methodological recommendations.
    Rudsits BL; Hopkins WG; Hautier CA; Rouffet DM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 Apr; 124(4):831-839. PubMed ID: 29357495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of inertia correction and resistive load on fatigue during repeated sprints on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer.
    Bogdanis G; Papaspyrou A; Lakomy H; Nevill M
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Nov; 26(13):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18923956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the force-velocity test to determine the optimal braking force for a sprint exercise on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer.
    Linossier MT; Dormois D; Fouquet R; Geyssant A; Denis C
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 74(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 8954289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of load on wingate test performances and reliability.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Coudrat L; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3462-8. PubMed ID: 24936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Study Between the Wingate and Force-Velocity Anaerobic Cycling Tests: Effect of Physical Fitness.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Jan; 11(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 25849068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Norms for the Wingate anaerobic test with comparison to another similar test.
    Maud PJ; Shultz BB
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Jun; 60(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 2489835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.