These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25549826)

  • 1. Rationale and design of the dual-energy computed tomography for ischemia determination compared to "gold standard" non-invasive and invasive techniques (DECIDE-Gold): A multicenter international efficacy diagnostic study of rest-stress dual-energy computed tomography angiography with perfusion.
    Truong QA; Knaapen P; Pontone G; Andreini D; Leipsic J; Carrascosa P; Lu B; Branch K; Raman S; Bloom S; Min JK
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1031-40. PubMed ID: 25549826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
    Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial.
    Stuijfzand WJ; van Rosendael AR; Lin FY; Chang HJ; van den Hoogen IJ; Gianni U; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson R; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Lu Y; Berman DS; Narula J; Min JK; Bax JJ; Shaw LJ;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 5(12):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 32822476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rationale and Design of the CREDENCE Trial: computed TomogRaphic evaluation of atherosclerotic DEtermiNants of myocardial IsChEmia.
    Rizvi A; Hartaigh BÓ; Knaapen P; Leipsic J; Shaw LJ; Andreini D; Pontone G; Raman S; Khan MA; Ridner M; Nabi F; Gimelli A; Jang J; Cole J; Nakazato R; Zarins C; Han D; Lee JH; Szymonifika J; Gomez MJ; Truong QA; Chang HJ; Lin FY; Min JK
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Oct; 16(1):190. PubMed ID: 27716131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.
    Min JK; Berman DS; Budoff MJ; Jaffer FA; Leipsic J; Leon MB; Mancini GB; Mauri L; Schwartz RS; Shaw LJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 21930103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs
    Williams MC; Mirsadraee S; Dweck MR; Weir NW; Fletcher A; Lucatelli C; MacGillivray T; Golay SK; Cruden NL; Henriksen PA; Uren N; McKillop G; Lima JA; Reid JH; van Beek EJ; Patel D; Newby DE
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
    Lipkin I; Telluri A; Kim Y; Sidahmed A; Krepp JM; Choi BG; Jonas R; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Crabtree TR; Earls JP; Choi AD; Min JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):407-419. PubMed ID: 35441530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On-site assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Miyajima K; Motoyama S; Sarai M; Kawai H; Nagahara Y; Matsumoto R; Fujiwara W; Muramatsu T; Takahashi H; Naruse H; Ishii J; Kondo T; Narula J; Izawa H; Ozaki Y
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 32350637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).
    Nørgaard BL; Leipsic J; Gaur S; Seneviratne S; Ko BS; Ito H; Jensen JM; Mauri L; De Bruyne B; Bezerra H; Osawa K; Marwan M; Naber C; Erglis A; Park SJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(12):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 24486266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
    Nous FMA; Geisler T; Kruk MBP; Alkadhi H; Kitagawa K; Vliegenthart R; Hell MM; Hausleiter J; Nguyen PK; Budde RPJ; Nikolaou K; Kepka C; Manka R; Sakuma H; Malik SB; Coenen A; Zijlstra F; Klotz E; van der Harst P; Artzner C; Dedic A; Pugliese F; Bamberg F; Nieman K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jan; 15(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 34538630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
    Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kim SM; Chang SA; Shin W; Choe YH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 24424556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography, Stress Dual-Energy CT Perfusion, and Stress Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison with Combined Invasive Coronary Angiography and Stress Perfusion Cardiac MRI.
    Chung HW; Ko SM; Hwang HK; So Y; Yi JG; Lee EJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 28458600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
    Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
    Nissen L; Winther S; Westra J; Ejlersen JA; Isaksen C; Rossi A; Holm NR; Urbonaviciene G; Gormsen LC; Madsen LH; Christiansen EH; Maeng M; Knudsen LL; Frost L; Brix L; Bøtker HE; Petersen SE; Bøttcher M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 19(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 29447342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of DECT in coronary artery disease: a comparative study with ICA and SPECT.
    Prasad Reddy KV; Singhal M; Vijayvergiya R; Sood A; Khandelwal N
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2020 Sep; 26(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 32755875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rationale and design of the RAPID-WATER-FLOW trial: Radiolabeled perfusion to identify coronary artery disease using water to evaluate responses of myocardial FLOW.
    Di Carli MF; Gormsen LC; Chareonthaitawee P; Johnson GB; Beanlands R; DeKemp R; Schindler T; Gropler R; Kulkarni H; McNeely P; Soman P; Oz O; Zaha V; Sorensen J; Harms H; Orlandi C; Vandenbroucke E; Udelson J
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 31():101779. PubMed ID: 38215598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.