138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25550995)
1. Improvement of distension and mural visualization of bowel loops using neutral oral contrasts in abdominal computed tomography.
Hashemi J; Davoudi Y; Taghavi M; Pezeshki Rad M; Moghadam AM
World J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 6(12):907-12. PubMed ID: 25550995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography.
Lim BK; Bux SI; Rahmat K; Lam SY; Liew YW
Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):732-6. PubMed ID: 23192500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative and qualitative bowel analysis using mannitol, water and iodine-based endoluminal contrast agent on 64-row detector CT.
Prakashini K; Kakkar C; Sambhaji C; Shetty CM; Rao VR
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 23(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 24604944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gastrointestinal tract wall visualization and distention during abdominal and pelvic multidetector CT with a neutral barium sulphate suspension: comparison with positive barium sulphate suspension and with water.
Oliva MR; Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Rocha T; Ros PR; Silverman SG; Mortele KJ
JBR-BTR; 2012; 95(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23019990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Mannitol, Water, and Iodine-Based Oral Contrast in the Evaluation of the Bowel by Multi-Detector Computed Tomography.
Thati SS; Nagegowda R; Sakalecha AK; Savagave SG; Patil DT
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24316. PubMed ID: 35607530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts.
Apisarnthanarak P; Tiangpug T; Pongpornsup S; Janpanich S; Suwannasit T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Apr; 96(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 23691702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT.
Berther R; Patak MA; Eckhardt B; Erturk SM; Zollikofer CL
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1902-9. PubMed ID: 18414870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of bowel distension and bowel wall visualization according to patient positions during administration of oral contrast media for CT enterography.
Lee SB; Kim SH; Son JH; Baik JY
Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170352. PubMed ID: 28972790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of negative oral contrast (milk with 4% fat) in PET-CT studies.
Meyer SA; Gawde S
Indian J Nucl Med; 2012 Jul; 27(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 23919067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distention.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Schneemann H; Kuehle C; Nuefer M; Ruehm SG; Goehde SC; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1400-6. PubMed ID: 15754160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three oral contrast preparations for magnetic resonance enterography in pediatric patients with known or suspected Crohn disease: a prospective randomized trial.
Gottumukkala RV; LaPointe A; Sargent D; Gee MS
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Jun; 49(7):889-896. PubMed ID: 30852650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of new oral contrast mixture for computed tomography enterography.
Evrimler Ş; Ocakoğlu G; Algin O
Pol J Radiol; 2019; 84():e403-e412. PubMed ID: 31969958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography of the bowel: a prospective comparison study between four techniques.
Paparo F; Garlaschi A; Biscaldi E; Bacigalupo L; Cevasco L; Rollandi GA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 22999647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
Erturk SM; Mortelé KJ; Oliva MR; Ichikawa T; Silverman SG; Cantisani V; Pagliara E; Ros PR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 17604930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Study of Four Oral Contrast Agents for Small Bowel Distension with Computed Tomography Enterography.
Leduc F; De A; Rebello R; Muhn N; Ioannidis G
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2015 May; 66(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 25585562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
