138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25550995)
21. Evaluation of simethicone-coated cellulose as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.
Sahani DV; Jhaveri KS; D'souza RV; Varghese JC; Halpern E; Harisinghani MG; Hahn PF; Saini S
Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 12755536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of neutral and positive enteral contrast media for MDCT enteroclysis.
Aiyappan SK; Kalra N; Sandhu MS; Kochhar R; Wig JD; Khandelwal N
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 21239131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of 2 different protocols for ingestion of low-attenuating oral contrast agent for multidetector computed tomography of the abdomen.
Meindl TM; Hagl E; Reiser MF; Mueller-Lisse UG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 17414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT.
Kaireit TF; Huisinga C; Peperhove M; Wacker F; Ringe KI
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225160. PubMed ID: 31725763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of different small bowel contrast agents by multi - detector row CT.
Wang YR; Yu XL; Peng ZY
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(9):16175-82. PubMed ID: 26629131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Dillman JR; Towbin AJ; Imbus R; Young J; Gates E; Trout AT
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 29737955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multi-detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window--initial experience.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Jaffe TA; Merkle EM; Paulson EK; Thomas J
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 17384239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in CT enterography.
Wong J; Roger M; Moore H
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 59(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25345816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
Matsuoka Y; Masumoto T; Koga H; Suzuki K; Ushimi T; Terada H; Tamura A; Yokoyama Y; Abe K; Kamata N
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differentiation of cancerous and inflammatory colorectal perforations using multi-detector computed tomography.
Gong XH; Zhuang ZG; Zhu J; Feng Q; Xu JR; Qian LJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2233-2242. PubMed ID: 28401282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of dilute Calogen as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media.
Ramsay DW; Markham DH; Morgan B; Rodgers PM; Liddicoat AJ
Clin Radiol; 2001 Aug; 56(8):670-3. PubMed ID: 11467870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases.
Paulsen SR; Huprich JE; Fletcher JG; Booya F; Young BM; Fidler JL; Johnson CD; Barlow JM; Earnest F
Radiographics; 2006; 26(3):641-57; discussion 657-62. PubMed ID: 16702444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of oral contrast on dose in abdominopelvic computed tomography with pure iterative reconstruction.
Murphy KP; Healy LJ; Crush L; Twomey M; Moloney F; Sexton S; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
World J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 8(9):809-815. PubMed ID: 27721943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of renal transplant donors with 16-section multidetector CT angiography: comparison of contrast media with low and high iodine concentrations.
Rau MM; Setty BN; Blake MA; Ouellette-Piazzo K; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 May; 18(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 17494841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Blunt abdominal trauma: performance of CT without oral contrast material.
Stuhlfaut JW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ulrich A; Rathlev NK; Burke PA; Hirsch EF
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 15516605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel biphasic oral contrast solution for enterographic studies.
Algin O; Evrimler S; Ozmen E; Metin MR; Ocakoglu G; Ersoy O; Karaoglanoglu M; Arslan H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 23321835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension.
Ajaj W; Goehde SC; Schneemann H; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2004 Mar; 14(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 14634782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multidetector CT of the small bowel: evaluation after oral hyperhydration with isotonic solution.
Mazzeo S; Caramella D; Belcari A; Melai L; Cappelli C; Fontana F; Bertini R; Caproni G; Giusti P; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2005; 109(5-6):516-26. PubMed ID: 15973225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients.
Boudiaf M; Jaff A; Soyer P; Bouhnik Y; Hamzi L; Rymer R
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 15459329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computed tomography of the abdomen with fat density oral contrast medium.
Malik N; Khandelwal N; Garg K; Suri S
Australas Radiol; 1992 Feb; 36(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 1632743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
