136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25551652)
1. An update on a spreadsheet method for computing consequences to the nearest maximally exposed offsite individual in compliance with DOE-STD-3009-94.
Vickers L
Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(1 Suppl 1):S42-9. PubMed ID: 25551652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Microsoft Excel to compute the 5% overall site X/Q value and the 95th percentile of the distribution of doses to the nearest maximally exposed offsite individual (MEOI).
Vickers LD
Health Phys; 2010 May; 98 Suppl 2():S48-55. PubMed ID: 20386192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using a Spreadsheet to Compute the Maximum Wind Sector 99.5th Percentile X/Q Value in Accordance with DOE-STD-3009-2014.
Vickers L
Health Phys; 2016 May; 110(5 Suppl 2):S67-72. PubMed ID: 27023153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of total effective dose equivalent and collective dose in the event of a LOCA in Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
Raisali G; Davilu H; Haghighishad A; Khodadadi R; Sabet M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16785243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kalman filtration of radiation monitoring data from atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials.
Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H; Smith JQ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15266085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. Department of Energy policies, directives, and guidance for radiological control and release of property.
Wallo A; Domotor S; Vázquez G
Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):526-8. PubMed ID: 17033468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical criteria to establish bioassay programs.
Lopez-Fidalgo J; Sanchez G
Health Phys; 2005 Oct; 89(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 16155454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indoor air radon concentration in schools in Prizren, Kosovo.
Bahtijari M; Stegnar P; Shemsidini Z; Kobal I; Vaupotic J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 16766569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the safety assessment of human exposure in the proximity of cellular communications base-station antennas at 900, 1800 and 2170 MHz.
Martínez-Búrdalo M; Martín A; Anguiano M; Villar R
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4125-37. PubMed ID: 16177535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice and criteria for selection of sampling strategies in environmental radioactivity monitoring.
Scott EM; Dixon P; Voigt G; Whicker W
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1575-81. PubMed ID: 18511288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of a Kalman filter based method for on-line estimation of atmospheric dispersion parameters using radiation monitoring data.
Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 15572402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chemical composition of 14C in airborne release from the Tokai reprocessing plant, Japan.
Koarashi J; Akiyama K; Asano T; Kobayashi H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):551-5. PubMed ID: 15860539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Key factors in imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments using the NAME model.
Haywood SM; Bedwell P; Hort MC
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 20220209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A real-time internal dose assessment exercise.
Bingham D; Bull RK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 22997001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Derived release limits for the greek research reactor site based on a diagnostic atmospheric modeling system for irregular terrain.
Varvayanni M; Catsaros N; Antonopoulos-Domis M
Health Phys; 2005 Apr; 88(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 15761295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. NRC absorbed dose reconstruction for family member of 131I therapy patient: case study and commentary.
Marcus CS; Siegel JA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):13N-6N, 37N. PubMed ID: 15073236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical Assessment of Internal Surface Smoothness and Particle Transmission to the American National Standard ANSI/HPS N13.1-2011.
Fritz BG; Barnett JM
Health Phys; 2015 Nov; 109(3 Suppl 3):S200-4. PubMed ID: 26425982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Notification levels related to the control of radioactive discharges.
Kanyár B; Volent G; Tóth K
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1558-60. PubMed ID: 18485719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
