188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25551959)
1. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.
Cheon WH; Park HJ; Park MJ; Lim MY; Park JH; Kang BJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Sep; 60(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 31501801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CASA in the medical laboratory: CASA in diagnostic andrology and assisted conception.
Tomlinson MJ; Naeem A
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Jun; 30(6):850-859. PubMed ID: 29559071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Watanabe A; Komiya A; Fuse H
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 20662592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA-810 series of sperm quality analysis system.
Ge YM; Lu JC; Tang SS; Xu YH; Liang YJ
J Clin Lab Anal; 2023 Dec; 37(23-24):e24986. PubMed ID: 38009489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of conventional and computer-assisted semen analysis (CRISMAS software) using samples from 166 young Danish men.
Vested A; Ramlau-Hansen CH; Bonde JP; Thulstrup AM; Kristensen SL; Toft G
Asian J Androl; 2011 May; 13(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 21516117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen.
Buss T; Aurich J; Aurich C
Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France.
Rolland M; Le Moal J; Wagner V; Royère D; De Mouzon J
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 23213178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.
Suzuki T; Shibahara H; Tsunoda H; Hirano Y; Taneichi A; Obara H; Takamizawa S; Sato I
Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11869377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer.
Park MJ; Lim MY; Park HJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Nov; 62(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 34729967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of the parameters obtained by sperm quality analyzer V and computer-aided sperm analysis system].
Ge YF; Wang CH; Shao Y; Yao B; Wu D; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Oct; 14(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 19157106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted semen analysis in large falcons (Falco spp.) and comparison to results of conventional semen analysis.
Fischer D; Schneider H; Meinecke-Tillmann S; Wehrend A; Lierz MW
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2023 Apr; 51(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 37230113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision
Engel KM; Grunewald S; Schiller J; Paasch U
Andrologia; 2019 Feb; 51(1):e13149. PubMed ID: 30255510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated motility and morphology measurement of live spermatozoa.
Dai C; Zhang Z; Jahangiri S; Shan G; Moskovstev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
Andrology; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 33740840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
