BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25552783)

  • 1. OPTIMIZATION BIAS IN ENERGY-BASED STRUCTURE PREDICTION.
    Petrella RJ
    J Theor Comput Chem; 2013 Dec; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 25552783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effect of disturbed ensemble distributions on SCFG based statistical sampling of RNA secondary structures.
    Scheid A; Nebel ME
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():159. PubMed ID: 22776037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a sophisticated SCFG design for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Nebel ME; Scheid A
    Theory Biosci; 2011 Dec; 130(4):313-36. PubMed ID: 22135038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A population-based evolutionary search approach to the multiple minima problem in de novo protein structure prediction.
    Saleh S; Olson B; Shehu A
    BMC Struct Biol; 2013; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 24565020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Balancing multiple objectives in conformation sampling to control decoy diversity in template-free protein structure prediction.
    Zaman AB; Shehu A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):211. PubMed ID: 31023237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating knowledge-based biases into an energy-based side-chain modeling method: application to comparative modeling of protein structure.
    Mendes J; Nagarajaram HA; Soares CM; Blundell TL; Carrondo MA
    Biopolymers; 2001 Aug; 59(2):72-86. PubMed ID: 11373721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UniCon3D: de novo protein structure prediction using united-residue conformational search via stepwise, probabilistic sampling.
    Bhattacharya D; Cao R; Cheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(18):2791-9. PubMed ID: 27259540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 6th Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop.
    He J; Shehu A; Haspel N; Chen B
    BMC Struct Biol; 2013; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I1. PubMed ID: 24564893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Teamwork Makes the Dream Work": Tribal Competition Evolutionary Search as a Surrogate for Free-Energy-Based Structural Predictions.
    Loeffler TD; Chan H; Gray S; Sankaranarayanan SKRS
    J Phys Chem A; 2019 May; 123(17):3903-3910. PubMed ID: 30939871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein loop modeling using a new hybrid energy function and its application to modeling in inaccurate structural environments.
    Park H; Lee GR; Heo L; Seok C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113811. PubMed ID: 25419655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computing the Free Energy Barriers for Less by Sampling with a Coarse Reference Potential while Retaining Accuracy of the Target Fine Model.
    Plotnikov NV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Aug; 10(8):2987-3001. PubMed ID: 25136268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias.
    Hamelryck T; Kent JT; Krogh A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Sep; 2(9):e131. PubMed ID: 17002495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective protein conformational sampling based on predicted torsion angles.
    Yang Y; Zhou Y
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Apr; 37(11):976-80. PubMed ID: 26696379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constrained optimization and protein structure determination.
    Eisenfeld J; Vajda S; Sugar I; DeLisi C
    Am J Physiol; 1991 Aug; 261(2 Pt 1):C376-86. PubMed ID: 1872378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conformer generation under restraints.
    de Bakker PI; Furnham N; Blundell TL; DePristo MA
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Apr; 16(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 16483766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The energy computation paradox and ab initio protein folding.
    Faver JC; Benson ML; He X; Roberts BP; Wang B; Marshall MS; Sherrill CD; Merz KM
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18868. PubMed ID: 21541343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protein homology model refinement by large-scale energy optimization.
    Park H; Ovchinnikov S; Kim DE; DiMaio F; Baker D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):3054-3059. PubMed ID: 29507254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A New Method of RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Dynamic Programming.
    Zhang H; Zhang C; Li Z; Li C; Wei X; Zhang B; Liu Y
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():467. PubMed ID: 31191603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling bottlenecks in de novo protein structure prediction.
    Kim DE; Blum B; Bradley P; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Oct; 393(1):249-60. PubMed ID: 19646450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.