These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25553603)
41. Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries' Definitions of Revision. Liebs TR; Splietker F; Hassenpflug J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3421-30. PubMed ID: 25791442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An American implant registry: a clinical use trip wire. Maloney WJ Orthopedics; 2002 Sep; 25(9):923-4. PubMed ID: 12269411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The manufacture of generic replicas of implants for arthroplasty of the hip and knee: is it regulated and will it save money? Atrey A; Heylen S; Gosling O; Porteous MJ; Haddad FS Bone Joint J; 2016 Jul; 98-B(7):892-900. PubMed ID: 27365466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome. Lacny S; Bohm E; Hawker G; Powell J; Marshall DA Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):442-51. PubMed ID: 27037425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. National and international postmarket research and surveillance implementation: achievements of the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries initiative. Sedrakyan A; Paxton E; Graves S; Love R; Marinac-Dabic D J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25520412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Lessons learned from the global orthopaedic registry: study design, current practice patterns, and future directions. Warwick D; Agnelli G; Cushner F; Friedman RJ; FitzGerald G; Gallus A; GLORY Publication Committee Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Sep; 39(9 Suppl):29-31. PubMed ID: 21290029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans. Franklin PD; Lewallen D; Bozic K; Hallstrom B; Jiranek W; Ayers DC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):104-9. PubMed ID: 25520425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Implementation of a Comprehensive Orthopaedic Registry System. Tokish JM; Alexander TC Instr Course Lect; 2016; 65():593-9. PubMed ID: 27049225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. International Breast Implant Registry: a user report. Renner C; Neuhann-Lorenz C Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(5):616-21. PubMed ID: 16977356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Is There Anything to Learn from a National Joint Registry? Muir D Foot Ankle Clin; 2017 Jun; 22(2):465-475. PubMed ID: 28502358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Effect on Long-Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior-Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63,416 Prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Vertullo CJ; Lewis PL; Lorimer M; Graves SE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jul; 99(13):1129-1139. PubMed ID: 28678126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Paxton EW; Kiley ML; Love R; Barber TC; Funahashi TT; Inacio MC Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Jun; 39(6):246-52. PubMed ID: 23789161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Review of clinical outcomes-based anchors of minimum clinically important differences in hip and knee registry-based reports and publications. Romero L; Nieuwenhuijse M; Carr A; Sedrakyan A J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):98-103. PubMed ID: 25520424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Outlier analysis in orthopaedics: use of CUSUM: the Scottish Arthroplasty Project: shouldering the burden of improvement. Macpherson GJ; Brenkel IJ; Smith R; Howie CR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():81-8. PubMed ID: 22262430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data. Sarraf KM; Konan S; Pastides PS; Haddad FS; Oussedik S J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1571-4. PubMed ID: 23538124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Examining the ethical implications of an orthopaedic joint registry. Capozzi JD; Rhodes R J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 May; 92(5):1330-3. PubMed ID: 20439699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Practice patterns in the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty--insights from the Multinational Global Orthopaedic Registry (GLORY). Friedman RJ; Gallus A; Gil-Garay E; FitzGerald G; Cushner F Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Sep; 39(9 Suppl):14-21. PubMed ID: 21290027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Letter to the Editor on "Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry". Martin SJ; Scholes CJ; Genon MP J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2192-2193. PubMed ID: 31204224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]