These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25553609)
41. Prevalence and severity of pediatric emergencies in a German helicopter emergency service: implications for training and service configuration. Mockler S; Metelmann C; Metelmann B; Thies KC Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Nov; 182(11):5057-5065. PubMed ID: 37656240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dermal Abrasion Experienced as an Adverse Effect of the EZ-IO(®). Overbey JK; Kon AA J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 50(1):e7-10. PubMed ID: 26603361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Characteristics of Children Who Undergo Intraosseous Needle Placement. Reuter-Rice K; Patrick D; Kantor E; Nolin C; Foley J Adv Emerg Nurs J; 2015; 37(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 26509727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Saving the critically injured trauma patient: a retrospective analysis of 1000 uses of intraosseous access. Lewis P; Wright C Emerg Med J; 2015 Jun; 32(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 24981009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intraosseous vascular access using the EZ-IO can be safely maintained in the adult proximal humerus and proximal tibia for up to 48 h: Report of a clinical study. Philbeck TE; Puga TA; Montez DF; Davlantes C; DeNoia EP; Miller LJ J Vasc Access; 2022 May; 23(3):339-347. PubMed ID: 33541218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Pediatric emergency patients in the air rescue service. Mission reality with special consideration to "invasive" measures]. Helm M; Biehn G; Lampl L; Bernhard M Anaesthesist; 2010 Oct; 59(10):896-903. PubMed ID: 20635067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of two intraosseous devices in adult patients in the emergency setting: a pilot study. Demir OF; Aydin K; Akay H; Erbil B; Karcioglu O; Gulalp B Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25075979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Reades R; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S; Garrett J Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 58(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 21856044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by helicopter emergency medical service, does it has added value compared to regular emergency medical service? Moors XRJ; Rijs K; Den Hartog D; Stolker RJ Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28711949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. IO versus IV access while wearing personal protective equipment in a HazMat scenario. Suyama J; Knutsen CC; Northington WE; Hahn M; Hostler D Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 17907035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Epinephrine administration in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A comparison between intraosseous and intravenous route. Yang SC; Hsu YH; Chang YH; Chien LT; Chen IC; Chiang WC Am J Emerg Med; 2023 May; 67():63-69. PubMed ID: 36806977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial. Drozd A; Smereka J; Pruc M; Malysz M; Gasecka A; Sonmez LO; Cyran M; Konge L; Szarpak L Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():189-194. PubMed ID: 34126564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study. Kurowski A; Timler D; Evrin T; Szarpak Ł Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1490-3. PubMed ID: 25440232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A randomized comparison of cardiocerebral and cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Mader TJ; Kellogg AR; Walterscheid JK; Lodding CC; Sherman LD Resuscitation; 2010 May; 81(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 20176434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The association of tibial vs. humeral intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Brebner C; Asamoah-Boaheng M; Zaidel B; Yap J; Scheuermeyer F; Mok V; Christian M; Kawano T; Singh L; van Diepen S; Christenson J; Grunau B Resuscitation; 2023 Dec; 193():110031. PubMed ID: 37923113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intraosseous vascular access is safe, effective and costs less than central venous catheters for patients in the hospital setting. Dolister M; Miller S; Borron S; Truemper E; Shah M; Lanford MR; Philbeck TE J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 23283646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Tibial Intraosseous Insertion in Pediatric Emergency Care: A Review Based upon Postmortem Computed Tomography. Harcke HT; Curtin RN; Harty MP; Gould SW; Vershvovsky J; Collins GL; Murphy S Prehosp Emerg Care; 2020; 24(5):665-671. PubMed ID: 31774707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Risk stratification of extravasation during semi-automatic intraosseous device use in a pediatric emergency setting. Sasaoka Y; Mori T; Takei H; Hagiwara Y; Nomura O Pediatr Int; 2023; 65(1):e15686. PubMed ID: 37991181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Distal femur versus humeral or tibial IO, access in adult out of hospital cardiac resuscitation. Rayas EG; Winckler C; Bolleter S; Stringfellow M; Miramontes D; Shumaker J; Lewis A; Wampler D Resuscitation; 2022 Jan; 170():11-16. PubMed ID: 34748766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Intraosseous vascular access in adults using the EZ-IO in an emergency department. Ngo AS; Oh JJ; Chen Y; Yong D; Ong ME Int J Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 20157465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]