These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25553669)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of Günther Tulip and Celect filters: testing filtering efficiency and pressure drop.
    Nicolas M; Malvé M; Peña E; Martínez MA; Leask R
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25553669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency.
    Günther RW; Neuerburg J; Mossdorf A; Pfeffer J; Høj AR; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Bücker A; Schmitz-Rode T
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 15871077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Günther Tulip and Celect IVC filters in multiple-trauma patients.
    Rosenthal D; Kochupura PV; Wellons ED; Burkett AB; Methodius-Rayford WC
    J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Aug; 16(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 19702346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of optionally retrievable and permanent IVC filters.
    Mahnken AH; Pfeffer J; Stanzel S; Mossdorf A; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 17568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters.
    Durack JC; Westphalen AC; Kekulawela S; Bhanu SB; Avrin DE; Gordon RL; Kerlan RK
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Apr; 35(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 21448771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications of Celect, Günther tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava filters on CT follow-up: a single-institution experience.
    McLoney ED; Krishnasamy VP; Castle JC; Yang X; Guy G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1723-9. PubMed ID: 24041915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple emboli and filter function: an in vitro comparison of three vena cava filters.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kvernebo K; Laerum F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 8850665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
    Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters.
    Keller IS; Meier C; Pfiffner R; Keller E; Pfammatter T
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 17446541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma.
    Rosenthal D; Wellons ED; Hancock SM; Burkett AB
    J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Jun; 14(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 17723017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term retrieval of modified Günther Tulip vena cava Filters: an animal study.
    Buecker A; Behrendt FF; Knüchel R; Kinzel S; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Neuerburg J; Günther RW
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Oct; 42(10):692-6. PubMed ID: 17984766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporary inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison with permanent IVC filters.
    Stoneham GW; Burbridge BE; Millward SF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 8541676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gunther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval, and complications.
    Looby S; Given MF; Geoghegan T; McErlean A; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics.
    Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters.
    Terhaar OA; Lyon SM; Given MF; Foster AE; Mc Grath F; Lee MJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1257-62. PubMed ID: 15525745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caval penetration by retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective comparison of Option and Günther Tulip filters.
    Olorunsola OG; Kohi MP; Fidelman N; Westphalen AC; Kolli PK; Taylor AG; Gordon RL; LaBerge JM; Kerlan RK
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 23462065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic demonstration of vena cava wall penetration by inferior vena cava filters in an ovine model.
    Laborda A; Lostalé F; Rodríguez JB; Bielsa MÁ; Martínez MÁ; Serrano C; Fernández R; De Gregorio MÁ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 21481604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A resolved two-way coupled CFD/6-DOF approach for predicting embolus transport and the embolus-trapping efficiency of IVC filters.
    Aycock KI; Campbell RL; Manning KB; Craven BA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):851-869. PubMed ID: 27904980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the in vitro clot-capturing efficiencies of commercially available retrievable inferior vena cava filters.
    Zhao H; Zhang X; Tsauo J; Li J; Gong T; Sang M; Li X
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2022 Mar; 10(2):463-468.e2. PubMed ID: 34487891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Denali, Tulip, and Option Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: A Single Center Experience.
    Ramaswamy RS; Jun E; van Beek D; Mani N; Salter A; Kim SK; Akinwande O
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Apr; 41(4):572-577. PubMed ID: 29260304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.