These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25553851)
1. The effect of fontanel on scalp EEG potentials in the neonate. Gargiulo P; Belfiore P; Friðgeirsson EA; Vanhatalo S; Ramon C Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Sep; 126(9):1703-10. PubMed ID: 25553851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models. Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EEG in neonates: Forward modeling and sensitivity analysis with respect to variations of the conductivity. Azizollahi H; Darbas M; Diallo MM; Badia AE; Lohrengel S Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):905-932. PubMed ID: 30380315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates. Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of unfused cranial bones on magnetoencephalography signals in human infants. Lew S; Hämäläinen MS; Ahlfors SP; Okada Y Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Mar; 132(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 33571879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the distortion of EEG signals caused by a hole in the skull mimicking the fontanel in the skull of human neonates. Flemming L; Wang Y; Caprihan A; Eiselt M; Haueisen J; Okada Y Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 116(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15826855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model. Lew S; Sliva DD; Choe MS; Grant PE; Okada Y; Wolters CH; Hämäläinen MS Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():282-93. PubMed ID: 23531680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the effects of head modelling errors and measurement noise on EEG source localization accuracy in preterm newborns: A single-subject study. Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Kazemi K; Wallois F Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 58(3):2746-2765. PubMed ID: 37448164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model. Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG. Pursiainen S; Lew S; Wolters CH J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):876-884. PubMed ID: 27852731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation. Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations. Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Source localization of scalp-EEG interictal spikes in posterior cortex epilepsies investigated by HR-EEG and SEEG. Gavaret M; Trébuchon A; Bartolomei F; Marquis P; McGonigal A; Wendling F; Regis J; Badier JM; Chauvel P Epilepsia; 2009 Feb; 50(2):276-89. PubMed ID: 18717708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull. Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study. Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of structural complexities in head modeling on the accuracy of EEG source localization in neonates. Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F J Neural Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(5):056004. PubMed ID: 32942266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization. Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influences of skull segmentation inaccuracies on EEG source analysis. Lanfer B; Scherg M; Dannhauer M; Knösche TR; Burger M; Wolters CH Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):418-31. PubMed ID: 22584227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity. Gençer NG; Acar CE Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical imaging on a head template: a simulation study using a resistor mesh model (RMM). Chauveau N; Franceries X; Aubry F; Celsis P; Rigaud B Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18629625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]