170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25554017)
1. Demographic and practice characteristics of pathologists who enjoy breast tissue interpretation.
Oster NV; Geller BM; Carney PA; Reisch LM; Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick P; Elmore JG
Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 25554017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Weaver DL; Onega T; Allison KH; Frederick PD; Tosteson AN; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):955-60. PubMed ID: 25053542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.
Geller BM; Bowles EJ; Sohng HY; Brenner RJ; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Elmore JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 19155395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics and diagnostic performance of pathologists who enjoy interpreting melanocytic lesions.
Radick AC; Phipps AI; Piepkorn MW; Nelson HD; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Reisch LM; Frederick PD; Elmore JG
Dermatol Online J; 2018 Jun; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 30142708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making.
Frederick PD; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Brunyé TT; Allison KH; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Med Decis Making; 2017 Jan; 37(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 27037007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Onega T; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953. PubMed ID: 28465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast pathology review: does it make a difference?
Romanoff AM; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz CR; Jaffer SM; Nagi CS; Bleiweiss IJ; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3504-8. PubMed ID: 24859936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.
Elmore JG; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Tosteson AN; Geller B; Onega T; Carney PA; Jackson SL; Allison KH; Weaver DL
Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 26999810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational pathology to discriminate benign from malignant intraductal proliferations of the breast.
Dong F; Irshad H; Oh EY; Lerwill MF; Brachtel EF; Jones NC; Knoblauch NW; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Johnson NB; Rao LK; Faulkner-Jones B; Wilbur DC; Schnitt SJ; Beck AH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114885. PubMed ID: 25490766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sampling grossly benign breast biopsy specimens.
Lancet; 1989 Aug; 2(8660):425-6. PubMed ID: 2569604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.
Samples LS; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Nelson HD; Morgan TR; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():34-43. PubMed ID: 28475933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
