296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25554521)
1. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments.
Linder SK; Kamath GR; Pratt GF; Saraykar SS; Volk RJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 25554521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.
Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed.
Schmidt CM; Cox R; Fial AV; Hartman TL; Magee ML
J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Apr; 104(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 27076801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
Hanneke R; Young SK
Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
Shariff SZ; Bejaimal SA; Sontrop JM; Iansavichus AV; Haynes RB; Weir MA; Garg AX
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e164. PubMed ID: 23948488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specialist Bibliographic Databases.
Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Trukhachev VI; Kostyukova EI; Gerasimov AN; Kitas GD
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 May; 31(5):660-73. PubMed ID: 27134485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.
Freeman MK; Lauderdale SA; Kendrach MG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research.
Hanneke R; O'Brien KK
J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Apr; 104(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 27076797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
De Groote SL; Raszewski R
Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Information Retrieval in Food Science Research II: Accounting for Relevance When Evaluating Database Performance.
Urhan TK; Rempel HG; Meunier-Goddik L; Penner MH
J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):2729-2735. PubMed ID: 31550403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.
Gusenbauer M; Haddaway NR
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):181-217. PubMed ID: 31614060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of semantic search within the domains of uncertainty: using Keyword Effectiveness Indexing as an evaluation tool.
Lorence D; Abraham J
Int J Electron Healthc; 2006; 2(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 18048249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multidisciplinary links in biomedical engineering--a more compact information structure.
Kantor G
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2004; 23(6):8. PubMed ID: 15688583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Textpresso: an ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature.
Müller HM; Kenny EE; Sternberg PW
PLoS Biol; 2004 Nov; 2(11):e309. PubMed ID: 15383839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
