These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25554521)

  • 1. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments.
    Linder SK; Kamath GR; Pratt GF; Saraykar SS; Volk RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 25554521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.
    Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed.
    Schmidt CM; Cox R; Fial AV; Hartman TL; Magee ML
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Apr; 104(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 27076801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R; Young SK
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
    Shariff SZ; Bejaimal SA; Sontrop JM; Iansavichus AV; Haynes RB; Weir MA; Garg AX
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e164. PubMed ID: 23948488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews.
    Frandsen TF; Eriksen MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():85-91. PubMed ID: 37201687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
    Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specialist Bibliographic Databases.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Trukhachev VI; Kostyukova EI; Gerasimov AN; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 May; 31(5):660-73. PubMed ID: 27134485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.
    Freeman MK; Lauderdale SA; Kendrach MG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research.
    Hanneke R; O'Brien KK
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Apr; 104(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 27076797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
    Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
    FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
    De Groote SL; Raszewski R
    Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information Retrieval in Food Science Research II: Accounting for Relevance When Evaluating Database Performance.
    Urhan TK; Rempel HG; Meunier-Goddik L; Penner MH
    J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):2729-2735. PubMed ID: 31550403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.
    Gusenbauer M; Haddaway NR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):181-217. PubMed ID: 31614060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of semantic search within the domains of uncertainty: using Keyword Effectiveness Indexing as an evaluation tool.
    Lorence D; Abraham J
    Int J Electron Healthc; 2006; 2(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 18048249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidisciplinary links in biomedical engineering--a more compact information structure.
    Kantor G
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2004; 23(6):8. PubMed ID: 15688583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.