188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25554540)
1. Volume and landmark analysis: comparison of MRI measurements obtained with an endorectal coil and with a phased-array coil.
Mazaheri Y; Afaq AA; Jung SI; Goldman DA; Wang L; Aslan H; Zelefsky MJ; Akin O; Hricak H
Clin Radiol; 2015 Apr; 70(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 25554540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy.
Mazaheri Y; Goldman DA; Di Paolo PL; Akin O; Hricak H
Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 25708867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils.
Husband JE; Padhani AR; MacVicar AD; Revell P
Clin Radiol; 1998 Sep; 53(9):673-81. PubMed ID: 9766721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer.
Shah ZK; Elias SN; Abaza R; Zynger DL; DeRenne LA; Knopp MV; Guo B; Schurr R; Heymsfield SB; Jia G
Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 25579637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of prostate measurements on MRI with and without an endorectal coil.
Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Kurteva T; Ghavamian R; Rozenblit AM
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 25457525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in prostate shape and volume and their implications for radiotherapy after introduction of endorectal balloon as determined by MRI at 3T.
Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; van Lin EN; Visser AG; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1446-53. PubMed ID: 19036532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate.
Hansford BG; Karademir I; Peng Y; Jiang Y; Karczmar G; Thomas S; Yousuf A; Antic T; Eggener S; Oto A
Acad Radiol; 2014 May; 21(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 24703469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil.
Barth BK; Cornelius A; Nanz D; Eberli D; Donati OF
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2218-2226. PubMed ID: 27369051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists.
Mueller-Lisse U; Mueller-Lisse U; Scheidler J; Klein G; Reiser M
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1826-33. PubMed ID: 15841384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
