1733 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25555050)
1. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.
Li Z; Yu S; Zhao Y; Hou S; Fu Q; Li F; Hou T; Zhong H
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 21(6):942-8. PubMed ID: 24411326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion.
Zhang HX; Shao YD; Chen Y; Hou Y; Cheng L; Si M; Nie L
Int Orthop; 2014 Dec; 38(12):2533-41. PubMed ID: 25209344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.
Shin DA; Yi S; Yoon DH; Kim KN; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 19444062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.
Elsawaf A; Mastronardi L; Roperto R; Bozzao A; Caroli M; Ferrante L
Neurosurg Rev; 2009 Apr; 32(2):215-24; discussion 224. PubMed ID: 18846395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.
Coric D; Nunley PD; Guyer RD; Musante D; Carmody CN; Gordon CR; Lauryssen C; Ohnmeiss DD; Boltes MO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 21699471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China.
Zhang X; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Wang B; Yan W; Li M; Yuan W; Wang Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 21673620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
Auerbach JD; Anakwenze OA; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical artificial disc replacement with ProDisc-C: clinical and radiographic outcomes with long-term follow-up.
Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Chan PG; Varma D
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 21(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 24417795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.
Kim SW; Limson MA; Kim SB; Arbatin JJ; Chang KY; Park MS; Shin JH; Ju YS
Eur Spine J; 2009 Feb; 18(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 19127374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
