These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and proteins. Gupta S; Kapoor P; Chaudhary K; Gautam A; Kumar R; ; Raghava GP PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73957. PubMed ID: 24058508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships. Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing of peptides with desired half-life in intestine-like environment. Sharma A; Singla D; Rashid M; Raghava GP BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):282. PubMed ID: 25141912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Annotation of Peptide Structures Using SMILES and Other Chemical Codes-Practical Solutions. Minkiewicz P; Iwaniak A; Darewicz M Molecules; 2017 Nov; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 29186902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MODEL-molecular descriptor lab: a web-based server for computing structural and physicochemical features of compounds. Li ZR; Han LY; Xue Y; Yap CW; Li H; Jiang L; Chen YZ Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jun; 97(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 17013940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation and prediction of gene expression level from amino acid and dipeptide composition of its protein. Raghava GP; Han JH BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():59. PubMed ID: 15773999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In silico quantitative prediction of peptides binding affinity to human MHC molecule: an intuitive quantitative structure-activity relationship approach. Tian F; Yang L; Lv F; Yang Q; Zhou P Amino Acids; 2009 Mar; 36(3):535-54. PubMed ID: 18575802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New horizons in mouse immunoinformatics: reliable in silico prediction of mouse class I histocompatibility major complex peptide binding affinity. Hattotuwagama CK; Guan P; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3274-83. PubMed ID: 15534705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Native and modeled disulfide bonds in proteins: knowledge-based approaches toward structure prediction of disulfide-rich polypeptides. Thangudu RR; Vinayagam A; Pugalenthi G; Manonmani A; Offmann B; Sowdhamini R Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):866-79. PubMed ID: 15645448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-based prediction of protein-peptide specificity in Rosetta. King CA; Bradley P Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3437-49. PubMed ID: 20954182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study. Klepeis JL; Wei Y; Hecht MH; Floudas CA Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):560-70. PubMed ID: 15609306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. VISH-Pred: an ensemble of fine-tuned ESM models for protein toxicity prediction. Mall R; Singh A; Patel CN; Guirimand G; Castiglione F Brief Bioinform; 2024 May; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 38842509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of partial amino acid composition from tandem mass spectra for use in peptide identification strategies. Shadforth I; Todd K; Crowther D; Bessant C Proteomics; 2005 May; 5(7):1787-96. PubMed ID: 15816003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binding of antifusion peptides with HIVgp41 from molecular dynamics simulations: quantitative correlation with experiment. Strockbine B; Rizzo RC Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):630-42. PubMed ID: 17335007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]