125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25556352)
1. Influence of using different bonding systems and composites on the margin integrity and the mechanical properties of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Dörfer C; Kleemann-Lüpkes J; Paris S; Blunck U
J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 25556352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of incompletely excavated teeth.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Meyer-Lueckel H; Boels A; Doerfer C; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 24333956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Margin Integrity and Secondary Caries of Lined or Non-lined Composite and Glass Hybrid Restorations After Selective Excavation In Vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kniess J; Paris S; Blunck U
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 27802124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of selective caries excavation on marginal penetration of class II composite restorations in vitro.
Scholz KJ; Hinderberger M; Widbiller M; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Buchalla W
Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Oct; 128(5):405-414. PubMed ID: 32749026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal integrity of class V restorations: SEM versus dye penetration.
Ernst CP; Galler P; Willershausen B; Haller B
Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 17669480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of adhesive system and bevel preparation on fracture strength of teeth restored with composite resin.
Coelho-de-Souza FH; Rocha Ada C; Rubini A; Klein-Júnior CA; Demarco FF
Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 20976383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
Hofmann N; Hunecke A
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
