These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

886 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25556538)

  • 1. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bozkurt S; Köse A; Arslan ED; Erdoğan S; Üçbilek E; Çevik İ; Ayrık C; Sezgin O
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
    Martínez-Cara JG; Jiménez-Rosales R; Úbeda-Muñoz M; de Hierro ML; de Teresa J; Redondo-Cerezo E
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes.
    Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Bethea E; Rupawala A; Kheder J; Nompleggi D; Liang P; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 50(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 26302496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Jung DH; Ko BS; Kim YJ; Kim WY
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
    Hyett BH; Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Kumar NL; Brozovic S; Claggett BL; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.
    Nakamura S; Matsumoto T; Sugimori H; Esaki M; Kitazono T; Hashizume M
    Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 24168099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.