76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25556606)
1. Porosity imaged by a vector projection algorithm correlates with fractal dimension measured on 3D models obtained by microCT.
Chappard D; Stancu IC
J Microsc; 2015 Apr; 258(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25556606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D Porous Architecture of Stacks of β-TCP Granules Compared with That of Trabecular Bone: A microCT, Vector Analysis, and Compression Study.
Chappard D; Terranova L; Mallet R; Mercier P
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2015; 6():161. PubMed ID: 26528240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional arrangement of β-tricalcium phosphate granules evaluated by microcomputed tomography and fractal analysis.
Ndiaye M; Terranova L; Mallet R; Mabilleau G; Chappard D
Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():404-11. PubMed ID: 25242650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomaterial porosity determined by fractal dimensions, succolarity and lacunarity on microcomputed tomographic images.
N'Diaye M; Degeratu C; Bouler JM; Chappard D
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 May; 33(4):2025-30. PubMed ID: 23498228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture.
Pothuaud L; Benhamou CL; Porion P; Lespessailles E; Harba R; Levitz P
J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Apr; 15(4):691-9. PubMed ID: 10780861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational fluid dynamics simulation from microCT stacks of commercial biomaterials usable for bone grafting.
Chappard D; Kün-Darbois JD; Guillaume B
Micron; 2020 Jun; 133():102861. PubMed ID: 32146253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Involvement of fractal geometry on solute permeation through porous poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) membranes.
Yanagawa F; Onuki Y; Morishita M; Takayama K
J Control Release; 2006 Jan; 110(2):395-399. PubMed ID: 16332400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-connected versus interconnected macroporosity in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) polymers. An X-ray microtomographic and histomorphometric study.
Filmon R; Retailleau-Gaborit N; Grizon F; Galloyer M; Cincu C; Basle MF; Chappard D
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2002; 13(10):1105-17. PubMed ID: 12484487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of cortical bone porosityIn Vitro by microcomputed tomography.
Wachter NJ; Augat P; Krischak GD; Mentzel M; Kinzl L; Claes L
Calcif Tissue Int; 2001 Jan; 68(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 28342035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of microcomputed tomographic and microradiographic measurements of cortical bone porosity.
Cooper DM; Matyas JR; Katzenberg MA; Hallgrimsson B
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 May; 74(5):437-47. PubMed ID: 14961208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synthesis and characterization of porous beta-tricalcium phosphate blocks.
Bohner M; van Lenthe GH; Grünenfelder S; Hirsiger W; Evison R; Müller R
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(31):6099-105. PubMed ID: 15885772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structure of drying fronts in three-dimensional porous media.
Shokri N; Sahimi M
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jun; 85(6 Pt 2):066312. PubMed ID: 23005211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel approach for quantification of porosity for biomaterial implants using microcomputed tomography (microCT).
Hiu-Yan Y; Ling Q; Kwong-Man L; Ming Z; Kwok-Sui L; Chun-yiu CJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Nov; 75(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 16108058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography.
Perrotti V; Aprile G; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 22140665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of a single aggregate inner porosity and pore accessibility using hard X-ray phase-contrast nanotomography.
Trtik P; Soos M; Münch B; Lamprou A; Mokso R; Stampanoni M
Langmuir; 2011 Nov; 27(21):12788-91. PubMed ID: 21939251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 1.9 μm superficially porous packing material with radially oriented pores and tailored pore size for ultra-fast separation of small molecules and biomolecules.
Min Y; Jiang B; Wu C; Xia S; Zhang X; Liang Z; Zhang L; Zhang Y
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Aug; 1356():148-56. PubMed ID: 24999068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative analysis of interconnectivity of porous biodegradable scaffolds with micro-computed tomography.
Moore MJ; Jabbari E; Ritman EL; Lu L; Currier BL; Windebank AJ; Yaszemski MJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Nov; 71(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 15376269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography.
Mathers AW; Hepworth C; Baillie AL; Sloan J; Jones H; Lundgren M; Fleming AJ; Mooney SJ; Sturrock CJ
Plant Methods; 2018; 14():99. PubMed ID: 30455724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton.
Jiang Y; Zhao J; White DL; Genant HK
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2000 Sep; 1(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15758525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation and geometrical analysis of dense clusters with variable fractal dimension.
Ehrl L; Soos M; Lattuada M
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Aug; 113(31):10587-99. PubMed ID: 19594146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
