These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25556648)

  • 1. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Mar; 21(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 25556648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance under redistricted allocation.
    Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Shteyn E; Pyke J; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Aug; 21(8):1031-9. PubMed ID: 25990089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.
    Kilambi V; Mehrotra S
    Transplantation; 2017 Feb; 101(2):350-359. PubMed ID: 27906775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement in the Outcomes of MELD ≥ 40 Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of 207 Consecutive Transplants in a Highly Competitive DSA.
    Nekrasov V; Matsuoka L; Kaur N; Pita A; Whang G; Cao S; Groshen S; Alexopoulos S
    Transplantation; 2017 Oct; 101(10):2360-2367. PubMed ID: 28319564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
    Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
    JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems.
    Schilsky ML; Moini M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 22(10):2922-30. PubMed ID: 26973389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors that affect deceased donor liver transplantation rates in the United States in addition to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score.
    Sharma P; Schaubel DE; Messersmith EE; Guidinger MK; Merion RM
    Liver Transpl; 2012 Dec; 18(12):1456-63. PubMed ID: 22965903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.
    DeRoos LJ; Zhou Y; Marrero WJ; Tapper EB; Sonnenday CJ; Lavieri MS; Hutton DW; Parikh ND
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Feb; 156(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 33263743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns of geographic variability in mortality and eligible deaths between organ procurement organizations.
    Cannon RM; Jones CM; Davis EG; Franklin GA; Gupta M; Shah MB
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Oct; 19(10):2756-2763. PubMed ID: 30980456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a standardized donor ratio to assess the performance of organ procurement organizations.
    Stogis S; Hirth RA; Strawderman RL; Banaszak-Holl J; Smith DG
    Health Serv Res; 2002 Oct; 37(5):1329-44. PubMed ID: 12479499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Acuity Circles on Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.
    Mogul DB; Perito ER; Wood N; Mazariegos GV; VanDerwerken D; Ibrahim SH; Mohammad S; Valentino PL; Gentry S; Hsu E
    Transplantation; 2020 Aug; 104(8):1627-1632. PubMed ID: 32732840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agree on much, except it is time for change.
    Samstein B; McElroy LM
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1912-1916. PubMed ID: 30884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.
    Croome KP; Lee DD; Burns JM; Keaveny AP; Taner CB
    Liver Transpl; 2018 Apr; 24(4):488-496. PubMed ID: 29365357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.
    Doby BL; Ross-Driscoll K; Yu S; Godwin M; Lee KJ; Lynch RJ
    Am J Transplant; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1614-1623. PubMed ID: 35118830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximizing donor potential: evolving organ procurement organization metrics and optimizing organ distribution and allocation in the United States.
    Washburn K
    Liver Transpl; 2012 Nov; 18 Suppl 2():S1-4. PubMed ID: 22767453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.
    Haugen CE; Ishaque T; Sapirstein A; Cauneac A; Segev DL; Gentry S
    Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):2044-2052. PubMed ID: 30748095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.
    Coombes JM; Trotter JF
    Clin Med Res; 2005 May; 3(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 16012126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model for end-stage liver disease exceptions in the context of the French model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system.
    Francoz C; Belghiti J; Castaing D; Chazouillères O; Duclos-Vallée JC; Duvoux C; Lerut J; Le Treut YP; Moreau R; Mandot A; Pageaux G; Samuel D; Thabut D; Valla D; Durand F
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Oct; 17(10):1137-51. PubMed ID: 21695771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List.
    Hsu EK; Shaffer ML; Gao L; Sonnenday C; Volk ML; Bucuvalas J; Lai JC
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Oct; 153(4):988-995. PubMed ID: 28711630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.
    Wood NL; Kernodle AB; Hartley AJ; Segev DL; Gentry SE
    Hepatology; 2021 Jul; 74(1):312-321. PubMed ID: 33219592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.