These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25556735)

  • 21. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
    Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.
    Biedler A; Wrobel M; Schneider S; Soltész S; Ziegeler S; Grundmann U
    J Anesth; 2013 Oct; 27(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 23460409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study.
    Bergmann I; Crozier TA; Roessler M; Schotola H; Mansur A; Büttner B; Hinz JM; Bauer M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 24387685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Gill RK; Tarat A; Pathak D; Dutta S
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28298751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of suitability of i-gel and laryngeal mask airway-supreme for controlled ventilation in anesthetized paralyzed patients: A prospective randomized trial.
    Radhika KS; Sripriya R; Ravishankar M; Hemanth Kumar VR; Jaya V; Parthasarathy S
    Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 26957697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective, randomized comparison of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients.
    Genzwuerker HV; Fritz A; Hinkelbein J; Finteis T; Schlaefer A; Schaeffer M; Thil E; Rapp HJ
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Dec; 16(12):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17121555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
    Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized comparison of the i-gel(TM) with the LMA Supreme (TM) in anesthetized adult patients.
    Beleña JM; Núñez M; Vidal A; Gasco C; Alcojor A; Lee P; Pérez JL
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Apr; 64(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 25801488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pressure versus volume-controlled ventilation with a laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients.
    Keidan I; Berkenstadt H; Segal E; Perel A
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2001 Nov; 11(6):691-4. PubMed ID: 11696145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
    Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of 2 cuff inflation methods of laryngeal mask airway Classic for safe use without cuff manometer in adults.
    Kim MS; Lee JR; Shin YS; Chung JW; Lee KH; Ahn KR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Mar; 32(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 24360025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effectiveness of Two Training Methods for Avoiding Excessive Inflation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme.
    Gong YH; Cheng S; Zhang ZY; Huang YG
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Jun; 37(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 26149149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children.
    Choi KW; Lee JR; Oh JT; Kim DW; Kim MS
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 25059727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal.
    Hosten T; Gurkan Y; Ozdamar D; Tekin M; Toker K; Solak M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Aug; 53(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19426239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ventilatory performance of AMBU® AuraGain™ and LMA® Supreme™ in laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Drakeford PA; Ng V; Seng Z; Chua M; Tan N; Mathew D; Teoh WH
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2021 Sep; 49(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 34550812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.