BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25556779)

  • 1. Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness.
    Fukui K; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Ichiseki T; Matsumoto T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 May; 25(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 25556779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
    Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress-shielding of the proximal femur using an extensively porous-coated femoral component without allograft in revision surgery: a 5- to 17-year follow-up study.
    Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Garcia-Rey E; Cruz-Pardos A; Madero R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1363-9. PubMed ID: 20884972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Paprosky WG; Greidanus NV; Antoniou J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):230-42. PubMed ID: 10611878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts.
    Ding Z; Ling T; Mou P; Wang D; Zhou K; Zhou Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 May; 15(1):194. PubMed ID: 32460781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision hip arthroplasty with an extensively 
porous-coated stem - excellent long-term 
results also in severe femoral bone stock loss.
    Thomsen PB; Jensen NJ; Kampmann J; Bæk Hansen T
    Hip Int; 2013; 23(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 23813156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem.
    Sinha RK; Dungy DS; Yeon HB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1254-61. PubMed ID: 15173300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extensively Porous-Coated Stems Demonstrate Excellent Long-Term Survivorship in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Dagneaux L; Sculco PK; Haight HJ; Larson DR; Howard JL; Abdel MP; Berry DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S217-S222. PubMed ID: 36907385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
    Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extensively coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty: follow-up study of 23 patients.
    Ng FY; Chiu KY; Yau WP; Ng TP; Tang WM
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Dec; 12(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 15621901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Jun; 17(4 Suppl 1):134-7. PubMed ID: 12068424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
    Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal femoral arthroplasty in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty.
    March GM; Dehghan N; Gala L; Spangehl MJ; Kim PR
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2171-4. PubMed ID: 25134742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
    Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modular diaphyseal anchor stems with locking screws in the hip revision with massive femoral defects.
    Marqués López F; Sala Pujals A; Fraile Suari A; Tey Pons M; León García A
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed); 2020; 64(6):409-414. PubMed ID: 32800719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total hip arthroplasty. Concerns with extensively porous coated femoral components.
    McAuley JP; Culpepper WJ; Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):182-8. PubMed ID: 9917603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
    Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
    Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem.
    Hasegawa M; Tone S; Naito Y; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
    Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1727-1733. PubMed ID: 33825004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.
    Zeng M; Xie J; Li M; Lin S; Hu Y
    Int Orthop; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1513-8. PubMed ID: 25693882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.