160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25557866)
1. Excisional treatments of the cervix and effect on subsequent fertility: a retrospective cohort study.
Martyn FM; McAuliffe FM; Beggan C; Downey P; Flannelly G; Wingfield MB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Feb; 185():114-20. PubMed ID: 25557866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity.
Khalid S; Dimitriou E; Conroy R; Paraskevaidis E; Kyrgiou M; Harrity C; Arbyn M; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2012 May; 119(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 22329499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
Boonlikit S; Thitisagulwong S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 22710953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of volume of cervical tissue removed during LLETZ on subsequent preterm delivery: a cohort study.
Kitson SJ; Greig E; Michael E; Smith M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():51-5. PubMed ID: 25016553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital.
van Velthoven K; Poppe W; Verschuere H; Arbyn M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():224-231. PubMed ID: 28822944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Number of fragments, margin status and thermal artifacts of conized specimens from LLETZ surgery to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião AM; Taha NS; Speck NG; Ribalta JC
Sao Paulo Med J; 2012; 130(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22481754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical surgery and preterm birth.
Sadler L; Saftlas A
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17313304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Cruickshank ME; Flannelly G; Campbell DM; Kitchener HC
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jun; 102(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 7632638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery.
Bevis KS; Biggio JR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21345402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Reinthaller A; Kainz C; Tempfer G; Joura E
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 7950445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
