These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25558347)

  • 1. Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications.
    Pachauri P; Bathala LR; Sangur R
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 6(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 25558347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography.
    Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Aragão FJ; Cooper LF
    Biomaterials; 2008 Oct; 29(28):3822-35. PubMed ID: 18617258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel surfaces and osseointegration in implant dentistry.
    Pellegrini G; Francetti L; Barbaro B; Del Fabbro M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Nov; 9(4):e12349. PubMed ID: 29971928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration].
    Nasatzky E; Gultchin J; Schwartz Z
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):8-19, 98. PubMed ID: 14515625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anodized dental implant surface.
    Mishra SK; Kumar MA; Chowdhary R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 28393822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review.
    Sivaraman K; Chopra A; Narayan AI; Balakrishnan D
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 28827030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nanosurface - the future of implants.
    Thakral G; Thakral R; Sharma N; Seth J; Vashisht P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 May; 8(5):ZE07-10. PubMed ID: 24995264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of controlled surface nanotopography on the early biological events of osseointegration.
    Karazisis D; Petronis S; Agheli H; Emanuelsson L; Norlindh B; Johansson A; Rasmusson L; Thomsen P; Omar O
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():559-571. PubMed ID: 28232253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review.
    Wenz HJ; Bartsch J; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 18350943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
    Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental implant bioactive surface modifications and their effects on osseointegration: a review.
    Meng HW; Chien EY; Chien HH
    Biomark Res; 2016; 4():24. PubMed ID: 27999672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part I: Review of titanium alloys, surface characteristics and treatments.
    Saghiri MA; Asatourian A; Garcia-Godoy F; Sheibani N
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jul; 21(4):e514-525. PubMed ID: 27031073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
    Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synergistic effect of nanotopography and bioactive ions on peri-implant bone response.
    Su Y; Komasa S; Li P; Nishizaki M; Chen L; Terada C; Yoshimine S; Nishizaki H; Okazaki J
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2017; 12():925-934. PubMed ID: 28184162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Titanium Dental Implants: A Comparative Systematic Review.
    López-Valverde N; Flores-Fraile J; Ramírez JM; Sousa BM; Herrero-Hernández S; López-Valverde A
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Surface Nanotopography on Bone Response to Titanium Implant.
    Freitas GP; Lopes HB; Martins-Neto EC; de Oliveira PT; Beloti MM; Rosa AL
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 26390195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.