These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review. Sivaraman K; Chopra A; Narayan AI; Balakrishnan D J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 28827030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental implant bioactive surface modifications and their effects on osseointegration: a review. Meng HW; Chien EY; Chien HH Biomark Res; 2016; 4():24. PubMed ID: 27999672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part I: Review of titanium alloys, surface characteristics and treatments. Saghiri MA; Asatourian A; Garcia-Godoy F; Sheibani N Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jul; 21(4):e514-525. PubMed ID: 27031073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synergistic effect of nanotopography and bioactive ions on peri-implant bone response. Su Y; Komasa S; Li P; Nishizaki M; Chen L; Terada C; Yoshimine S; Nishizaki H; Okazaki J Int J Nanomedicine; 2017; 12():925-934. PubMed ID: 28184162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Titanium Dental Implants: A Comparative Systematic Review. López-Valverde N; Flores-Fraile J; Ramírez JM; Sousa BM; Herrero-Hernández S; López-Valverde A J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32610687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Surface Nanotopography on Bone Response to Titanium Implant. Freitas GP; Lopes HB; Martins-Neto EC; de Oliveira PT; Beloti MM; Rosa AL J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 26390195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]