These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25558760)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of the principles and loosening force of the conical telescopic crown: a computer-based study.
    Fingerhut C; Schindler HJ; Schweizerhof K; Kordass B; Lenz J
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(3):199-218. PubMed ID: 25558760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the veneer-framework interface on the mechanical behavior of ceramic veneers: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Lazari PC; Sotto-Maior BS; Rocha EP; de Villa Camargos G; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):857-63. PubMed ID: 24721502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A; Langot C
    Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 22209573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of post-core and crown material and luting agents on stress distribution in tooth restorations.
    Oyar P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 24560984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of veneer failure of removable prosthodontics.
    Hahnel S; Bürgers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G; Behr M
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e1125-8. PubMed ID: 21054505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: a finite element analysis.
    Durmuş G; Oyar P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):547-54. PubMed ID: 24630398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns.
    de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ; de Jager N; Kuijs R; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25819357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factorial analysis of variables influencing stress in all-ceramic crowns.
    Rekow ED; Harsono M; Janal M; Thompson VP; Zhang G
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 16000218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of crown ferrule heights and dowel material selection on the mechanical behavior of root-filled teeth: a finite element analysis.
    Watanabe MU; Anchieta RB; Rocha EP; Kina S; Almeida EO; Freitas AC; Basting RT
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 22372913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CAD-FEA modeling and analysis of different full crown monolithic restorations.
    Dal Piva AMO; Tribst JPM; Borges ALS; Souza ROAE; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1342-1350. PubMed ID: 29934125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with a zirconia framework and feldspathic veneering: comparison of CAD/CAM-produced veneer with manually layered veneer.
    Schmitter M; Mueller D; Rues S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 40(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 23663118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel coping design to decrease maximum principal stress in zirconia ceramic restorations.
    Sung M; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 24750340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Menini M; Conserva E; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Signori A; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 24179969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear behavior of different double-crown systems.
    Engels J; Schubert O; Güth JF; Hoffmann M; Jauernig C; Erdelt K; Stimmelmayr M; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):503-10. PubMed ID: 22573245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parameters affecting retentive force of electroformed double-crown systems.
    Beuer F; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Naumann M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19343381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of substructure design and occlusal reduction on the stress distribution in metal ceramic complete crowns: 3D finite element analysis.
    Motta AB; Pereira LC; Duda FP; Anusavice KJ
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 24417730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element analysis studies of a metal-ceramic crown on a first premolar tooth.
    Proos KA; Swain MV; Ironside J; Steven GP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 12475155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cusp supporting framework design can decrease critical stresses in veneered molar crowns.
    Kirsten A; Parkot D; Raith S; Fischer H
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 24388004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.