These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Ulnar Artery Interventions Non-Inferior to Radial Approach: AJmer Ulnar ARtery (AJULAR) Intervention Working Group Study Results. Gokhroo R; Kishor K; Ranwa B; Bisht D; Gupta S; Padmanabhan D; Avinash A J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26716587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients. Geng W; Fu X; Gu X; Jiang Y; Fan W; Wang Y; Li W; Xing K; Liu C Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(7):1222-8. PubMed ID: 24709170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of transulnar approach for coronary angiography and intervention. Li YZ; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Guo YH; Liu YY; Shi DM; Wang ZJ; Jia DA; Yang SW; Nie B; Han HY; Hu B Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jul; 123(13):1774-9. PubMed ID: 20819645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study). Hahalis G; Tsigkas G; Xanthopoulou I; Deftereos S; Ziakas A; Raisakis K; Pappas C; Sourgounis A; Grapsas N; Davlouros P; Galati A; Plakomyti TE; Mylona P; Styliadis I; Pyrgakis V; Alexopoulos D Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 23735472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Ulnar Artery as a Favorable Primary or Alternative Access Site for Coronary Angiography and Interventions. Gunduz Y; Gunduz H; Ayhan LT; Ciner M; Cakmak A; Saribiyik B; Akcay C; Ilguz E; Cosansu K Angiology; 2020 May; 71(5):417-424. PubMed ID: 32166958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice. Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study. Aptecar E; Pernes JM; Chabane-Chaouch M; Bussy N; Catarino G; Shahmir A; Bougrini K; Dupouy P Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 May; 67(5):711-20. PubMed ID: 16557601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure. de Andrade PB; Tebet MA; Nogueira EF; Esteves VC; de Andrade MV; Labrunie A; Piva e Mattos LA Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 23067902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transulnar angiography and intervention: The next frontier in vascular access? Majithia A; Levy MS Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 86(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 26097055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Kedev S; Zafirovska B; Dharma S; Petkoska D Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E51-60. PubMed ID: 23832623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trans-ulnar catheterization and coronary interventions: From technique to outcomes. Sattur S; Singh M; Kaluski E Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Jun; 18(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 28216229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and feasibility of transulnar cardiac catheterization. Knebel AV; Cardoso CO; Correa Rodrigues LH; Sarmento-Leite RE; de Quadros AS; Mascia Gottschall CA Tex Heart Inst J; 2008; 35(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 18941595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiovascular Outcomes of Transulnar Versus Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Regression Matched Meta-Analysis. Faisaluddin M; Sattar Y; Song D; Titus A; Erdem S; Alsaud A; Alharbi AA; Sulaiman S; Khan SU; Elgendy IY; Sengodan P; Dani SS; Alam M; Alraies MC; Daggubati R Am J Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 201():92-100. PubMed ID: 37352671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Fernandez R; Zaky F; Ekmejian A; Curtis E; Lee A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 29388387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ulnar artery as access site for cardiac catheterization: anatomical considerations. Vassilev D; Smilkova D; Gil R J Interv Cardiol; 2008 Feb; 21(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 18086137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sedhom R; Megaly M; Abraham B; George JC; Kalra S; Janzer S Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 May; 26():39-45. PubMed ID: 33203582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility and Safety of Early Repeat Transradial Access Within 30 Days of Previous Coronary Angiography and Intervention. Barria Perez AE; Costerousse O; Cieza T; Barbeau G; Déry JP; Maes F; Rimac G; Plourde G; Poirier Y; Carrier MA; Bertrand OF; Am J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 120(8):1267-1271. PubMed ID: 28864317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]